How prepared are newly qualified allied health professionals for practice in the UK? A systematic review
dc.contributor.author | Brennan, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Burns, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Mattick, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Mitchell, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Henderson, T | |
dc.contributor.author | Walker, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Gale, T | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-09T14:13:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-05-15 | |
dc.date.updated | 2024-07-09T13:47:54Z | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVES: It is important that allied health professionals (AHPs) are prepared for clinical practice from the very start of their working lives to provide quality care for patients, for their personal well-being and for retention of the workforce. The aim of this study was to understand how well newly qualified AHPs were prepared for practice in the UK. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, ERIC and BEI were searched from 2012 to 2024. Grey literature searching and citation chasing were also conducted. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included primary studies reporting the preparedness for practice of UK graduates across 15 professions; all study types; participants included graduates who were up to 2 years postgraduation, their supervisors, trainers, practice educators and employers; and all outcome measures. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: A standardised data extraction form was used. Studies were quality assessed using the Quality Appraisal for Diverse Studies tool. 10% of articles were independently double-screened, extracted and quality assessed; 90% was completed by one researcher. RESULTS: 14 reports were included (9 qualitative, 3 mixed-method and 2 quantitative). Six papers focused on radiographers, three on a mixture of professions, two on paramedics, and one each on physiotherapists, clinical psychologists and orthotists. An important finding of the review is the paucity and low-medium quality of research on the topic. The narrative synthesis tentatively suggests that graduates are adequately prepared for practice with different professions having different strengths and weaknesses. Common areas of underpreparedness across the professions were responsibility and decision-making, leadership and research. Graduates were generally well prepared in terms of their knowledge base. CONCLUSION: High-quality in-depth research is urgently needed across AHPs to elucidate the specific roles, their nuances and the areas of underpreparedness. Further work is also needed to understand the transition into early clinical practice, ongoing learning opportunities through work, and the supervision and support structures in place. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022382065. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Health and Care Professions Council | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | e081518- | |
dc.format.medium | Electronic | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 14(5), article e081518 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081518 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/136645 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0003-1800-773X (Mattick, Karen) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38749689 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. | en_GB |
dc.title | How prepared are newly qualified allied health professionals for practice in the UK? A systematic review | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-09T14:13:57Z | |
exeter.place-of-publication | England | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from BMJ Publishing via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data availability statement: Data are available upon reasonable request. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2044-6055 | |
dc.identifier.journal | BMJ Open | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2024-03-28 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2024-05-15 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2024-07-09T14:12:09Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2025-03-07T00:52:15Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2024-05-15 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.