Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMcIntosh, ALS
dc.contributor.authorOzsanlav‐Harris, L
dc.contributor.authorTaggart, MA
dc.contributor.authorShaw, JM
dc.contributor.authorHilton, GM
dc.contributor.authorBearhop, S
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T09:48:17Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-26
dc.date.updated2024-07-17T10:46:59Z
dc.description.abstractLead is a toxic heavy metal that when ingested can cause death or sub-lethal fitness effects. Despite its toxicity, it is still widely used in recreational and management shooting globally. To reduce the impacts of lead on wildfowl, recent European Union legislation has banned the use of lead shot in and around wetlands from 2023. Understanding the effectiveness of such mitigation is vital to inform future policy. On Islay, Scotland, the licensed shooting of Barnacle Geese Branta leucopsis to reduce agricultural damage has adhered to the ban on use of lead shot over Ramsar-designated wetlands legislated in Scotland in 2004. On average 2380 lead cartridges were fired annually between 2005 and 2020 outside designated wetlands, where Barnacle Geese and other wildfowl forage. From faecal samples, it is possible to infer whether birds have ingested lead and are therefore potentially suffering from lead poisoning. After sampling faeces from Barnacle Geese (n = 193) and Greenland White-fronted Geese Anser albifrons flavirostris (n = 150) we found only four (1.2%) faecal samples with elevated lead levels that may be indicative of lead shot ingestion. Further post-mortem examinations (n = 102 Barnacle Geese only) and X-ray of live birds (n = 293) revealed similarly low levels of shot ingestion in both species (post-mortem < 4%, and X-ray < 2%), corroborating findings from faecal sample analysis. When subsequently accounting for limited shot retention time within individuals, the proportion of each population ingesting a single lead shot over a winter was estimated at a maximum of 9.4% (Barnacle Geese) and 16.8% (White-fronted Geese). We propose that high compliance with the ban on using lead shot over wetlands because of carefully controlled shooting management on Islay has led to relatively low instantaneous ingestion rates, probably resulting in minimal lead poisoning mortality. However, ingestion was not eliminated and the potential fitness effect of chronic lead poisoning in both goose populations therefore persists, although use of lead shot in organized shooting has subsequently been discontinued. Recent European Union bans on lead shot use over wetlands may reduce lead ingestion in waterfowl if compliance rates are high, but as foraging often occurs outside wetlands (as in this study), further restrictions including use on other key foraging sites may help to further mitigate the risk of lead poisoning in waterfowl.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Councilen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWildfowl and Wetlands Trusten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatureScoten_GB
dc.format.extent1397-1413
dc.identifier.citationVol. 165 (4), pp.1397-1413en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.13210
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/P010210/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/136756
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-5864-0129 (Bearhop, Stuart)
dc.identifierScopusID: 56840336400 | 6701787865 (Bearhop, Stuart)
dc.identifierResearcherID: G-3105-2012 (Bearhop, Stuart)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights© 2023 The Authors. Ibis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ornithologists' Union. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectBarnacle Gooseen_GB
dc.subjectFaecal samplingen_GB
dc.subjectLead poisoningen_GB
dc.subjectShooting managementen_GB
dc.subjectWhite-fronted Gooseen_GB
dc.titleIncidence of lead ingestion in managed goose populations and the efficacy of imposed restrictions on the use of lead shoten_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-07-18T09:48:17Z
dc.identifier.issn0019-1019
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement. R code, data and metadata used for this study are available at: https://github.com/LukeOzsanlav/Islay_LeadGeese.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1474-919X
dc.identifier.journalIbis: International Journal of Avian Scienceen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofIbis, 165(4)
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-03-16
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2023-03-26
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-07-18T09:31:22Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-07-18T09:50:08Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2023-03-26


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2023 The Authors. Ibis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ornithologists' Union. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2023 The Authors. Ibis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ornithologists' Union. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.