Tackling transparency in UK politics: application of large language models to clustering and classification of UK parliamentary divisions
dc.contributor.author | Lilley, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Townley, S | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-30T14:16:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-10-10 | |
dc.date.updated | 2024-07-30T12:47:50Z | |
dc.description.abstract | For a healthier democracy in the UK, novel methods of visualising political data are key to improving transparency, and encouraging engagement. The paper pro- poses a visualisation tool, using Large language models (LLMs), such as GPT3.5 and GPT4, to conduct Natural Language Processing (NLP) in a novel methodology. We investigate partisan voting profiles, specifically of the Conservative, Labour, and Liberal Democrat parties along 11 predetermined dimensions, rang- ing from Immigration & Borders, over Welfare & Social Housing, to European Union & Foreign Affairs. Higher order dimensions reveals shifts in party prefer- ence over time, while clear trends of more extreme voting behaviour can be seen across parties between 2016 - 2023. The novel visualisation methodology reveals that voting behaviour has become more polarised along party lines, with Labour becoming more left-wing and Conservatives becoming more right-wing regard- ing most political topics. Liberal Democrats voting behaviour has typically been those of an opposition party, albeit becoming somewhat more extreme. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 7, pp. 2563–2589 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s42001-024-00317-z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/136943 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0003-3524-4526 (Townley, Stuart) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://github.com/JDLilley/JDLilley/tree/main/Digital_Democracy/Data | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2024 The author(s). Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dc.subject | Large Language Models | en_GB |
dc.subject | Natural Language Processing | en_GB |
dc.subject | Digital Democracy | en_GB |
dc.subject | Visualisation Tools | en_GB |
dc.subject | GPT4 | en_GB |
dc.title | Tackling transparency in UK politics: application of large language models to clustering and classification of UK parliamentary divisions | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-30T14:16:03Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2432-2717 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Springer via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data Availability Statement: Debate-As-Text files are available to the public in the Hansard record of debates. To aid retrieval, these files have been stored in a GitHub repository: https://github.com/JDLilley/JDLilley/tree/main/Digital_Democracy/Data. Example from: https://github.com/JDLilley/JDLilley/blob/main/Digital_Democracy/Data/DebateAsText/Armed%20Forces%20Bill%202021-06-23.txt The generative outputs containing division classifications, as seen in table 5, have also been stored in the digital democracy GitHub repository under LLM Output: https://github.com/JDLilley/JDLilley/tree/main/Digital_Democracy/Data. Example from: https://github.com/JDLilley/JDLilley/blob/main/Digital_Democracy/Data/LLM Output/103590.txt | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2432-2725 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Computational Social Science | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2024-07-21 | |
dcterms.dateSubmitted | 2024-01-17 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2024-07-21 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2024-07-30T12:47:53Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2024-11-25T15:53:06Z | |
refterms.panel | B | en_GB |
exeter.rights-retention-statement | Yes |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2024 The author(s). Open access. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/