BI-REAL: A 12-session DBT skills group intervention adapted for bipolar disorder - A feasibility randomised pilot trial
dc.contributor.author | Azevedo, J | |
dc.contributor.author | Swales, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Carreiras, D | |
dc.contributor.author | Guiomar, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Macedo, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Castilho, P | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-06T08:12:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2024-04-13 | |
dc.date.updated | 2024-08-05T14:59:02Z | |
dc.description.abstract | International guidelines endorse psychological treatment for Bipolar Disorder (BD); however, the absence of a recognised gold-standard intervention requires further research. A Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) skills group intervention with 12 sessions was developed. This pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and outcomes variance of Bi-REAL - Respond Effectively, Assertively, and Live mindfully, tailored for individuals with BD, in preparation for a future RCT. METHODS: 52 participants (female = 62.7 %; mean age = 43.2 ± 11.1) with BD were randomised by blocks to either the experimental group (EG; n = 26; Bi-REAL + Treatment as Usual, TAU) receiving 12 weekly 90-minutes sessions, or the control group (CG; n = 26, TAU). Feasibility and acceptability were assessed with a multimethod approach (qualitative interviews, semi-structured clinical interviews and a battery of self-report questionnaires - candidate main outcomes Bipolar Recovery Questionnaire (BRQ) and brief Quality of Life for Bipolar Disorder (QoL.BD)). All participants were evaluated at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1) and 3-month follow-up (T2). RESULTS: Acceptability was supported by participants' positive feedback and ratings of the sessions and programme overall, as well as the treatment attendance (86.25 % of sessions attended). The trial overall retention rate was 74.5 %, with CG having a higher dropout rate across the 3-timepoints (42.31 %). A significant Time × Group interaction effect was found for BRQ and QoL.BD favouring the intervention group (p < .05). LIMITATIONS: The assessors were not blind at T1 (only at T2). Recruitment plan was impacted due to COVID-19 restrictions and replication is questionable. High attrition rates in the CG. CONCLUSIONS: The acceptability of Bi-REAL was sustained, and subsequent feasibility testing will be necessary to establish whether the retention rates of the overall trial improve and if feasibility is confirmed, before progressing to a definitive trial. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia | en_GB |
dc.format.extent | 394-404 | |
dc.format.medium | Print-Electronic | |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 356, pp. 394-404 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.033 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | SFRH/BD/130116/2017 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | SFRH/BD/5099/2020 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/137035 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0001-8537-1043 (Azevedo, Julieta) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_GB |
dc.relation.url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38615843 | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). | en_GB |
dc.subject | Bipolar disorder | en_GB |
dc.subject | DBT-ST | en_GB |
dc.subject | Skills training | en_GB |
dc.subject | Emotion regulation | en_GB |
dc.subject | Recovery | en_GB |
dc.subject | Pilot RCT | en_GB |
dc.title | BI-REAL: A 12-session DBT skills group intervention adapted for bipolar disorder - A feasibility randomised pilot trial | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-06T08:12:10Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0165-0327 | |
exeter.place-of-publication | Netherlands | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1573-2517 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Journal of Affective Disorders | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2024-04-08 | |
dc.rights.license | CC BY-NC-ND | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2024-04-13 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2024-08-06T07:57:42Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2024-08-06T08:17:45Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2024-04-13 |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).