Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMancini, D
dc.contributor.authorRoncoroni, M
dc.contributor.authorDietze, M
dc.contributor.authorJenkin, M
dc.contributor.authorMüller, T
dc.contributor.authorOuvry, B
dc.contributor.authorMiesen, F
dc.contributor.authorPythoud, Q
dc.contributor.authorHofmann, M
dc.contributor.authorLardet, F
dc.contributor.authorNicholas, AP
dc.contributor.authorLane, SN
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-12T14:49:40Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-10
dc.date.updated2024-08-12T14:08:18Z
dc.description.abstractProglacial forefields commonly include highly dynamic fluvial systems associated with the fundamental instability between topography, flow hydraulics and sediment transport. However, there is limited knowledge of how these systems respond to changing subglacial hydrology and sediment supply. We investigated this relationship using the first continuous field-collected data sets for both suspended and bedload sediment export and proglacial river dynamics for an Alpine glacier forefield, the Glacier d’Otemma, Switzerland. The results show a strong sensitivity of fluvial morphodynamics to the balance between sediment transport capacity and supply. When subglacial bedload export rates exceeded fluvial transport capacity, we found bar construction leading to net forefield aggradation and surficial coarsening, especially on bar heads. This intensified braiding buffered the downstream transport of coarse sediment. When subglacial bedload export rates were lower than transport capacity, incision occurred, with reduced braiding intensity, net erosion and important amounts of bedload leaving the proglacial system. We found a net fining of surficial deposits except for very isolated coarsening patterns on bar heads. Thus, proglacial forefield morphodynamics are strongly conditioned by subglacial hydrology and sediment supply, but this conditioning is also influenced by the response of the forefield itself. Proglacial forefields have an important influence on the longitudinal connectivity of sediment flux in regions sensitive to climate change, such as recently deglaciated high mountain areas. The linkages we report between subglacial processes and river morphodynamics are critical for understanding the development of embryonic forefield ecosystems.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFondation Agassiz of the Université de Lausanneen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSwiss National Science Foundation (SNSF)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 129(8), article e2024JF007727en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1029/2024jf007727
dc.identifier.grantnumberGrant N° 200021_188734en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/137123
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-8713-8656 (Nicholas, AP)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU) / Wileyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11347458en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6202732en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7514935en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8380815en_GB
dc.rights© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.en_GB
dc.titleRates of Evacuation of Bedload Sediment From an Alpine Glacier Control Proglacial Stream Morphodynamicsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-08-12T14:49:40Z
dc.identifier.issn2169-9003
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from the American Geophysical Union via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData Availability Statement: The data used in this study (i.e., DEMs, orthomosaics and grain size distribution maps) are available in Mancini et al. (2024b). Other data sets used in this study (i.e., water discharge records, 2020 orthomosaics, suspended load and bedload flux data) are archived in Zenodo and mentioned in the main text as Müller and Miesen (2022), Roncoroni et al. (2023a) and Mancini et al. (2023a).en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2169-9011
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surfaceen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-07-23
dcterms.dateSubmitted2024-03-08
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-08-10
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-08-12T14:46:12Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-08-12T14:50:14Z
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2024-08-10
exeter.rights-retention-statementNo


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.