Global links
University home
Studying
Research
Business
Working here
Alumni and supporters
Our departments
Visiting us
About us
ORE
Open Research Exeter
Advanced Search
Toggle navigation
Home
Browse
This Collection
Titles
Authors
Type
Recent submissions in ORE
Information
About ORE
Uploading to ORE
ORE Policies
Contact Us
Statistics
Most Popular Items
Statistics by Country
Most Popular Authors
Home
Browse
This Collection
Titles
Authors
Type
Recent submissions in ORE
Information
About ORE
Uploading to ORE
ORE Policies
Contact Us
Statistics
Most Popular Items
Statistics by Country
Most Popular Authors
View Item
ORE Home
Archive
Collections of Former Colleges
Institute of Health Research
View Item
ORE Home
Archive
Collections of Former Colleges
Institute of Health Research
View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Whose costs and benefits? Why economic evaluations should simulate both prevalent and all future incident patient cohorts.
Hoyle, M
;
Anderson, R
Date: 1 July 2010
http://hdl.handle.net/10871/13742
HOYLE ANDERSON submission #4 - Copy.pdf (PDF, 381.9Kb)
Article
Journal
Medical Decision Making
Publisher
Sage Publications
Publisher DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X09353946
Related links
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20228287
http://mdm.sagepub.com/content/30/4/426
Abstract
Most health technology economic evaluations simulate only the prevalent cohort or the next incident cohort of patients. They therefore do not capture all future patient-related benefits and costs.
View full metadata
Institute of Health Research
Collections of Former Colleges
Item views
0
Full item downloads
0
Show Statistical Information