Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSpencer, L
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T14:52:51Z
dc.date.issued2024-09-23
dc.date.updated2024-09-25T14:09:23Z
dc.description.abstractBoth early years students and the higher education academics who teach them are situated in neoliberal performance and accountability regimes that de-professionalise. This has been traditionally resisted by some teachers in higher education, including myself, through critical pedagogies, often using tools such as critical reflective practice, to enable students and academics to resist and position themselves. These critical pedagogies sit within a poststructural frame that attempts to deconstruct the neoliberal discursive structural power through education practices that activate agency. Despite the students’ ethical alignments with critical perspectives this was proving to be difficult for them to enact in their practice. There was an ongoing negative cycle of deconstructing ever changing policy frameworks that led to despondency and ‘stuckness’ for the students and myself, therefore something else was needed. This research is a posthumanist, feminist new materialist study that moves out of poststructural binaries of agency-structure and nature-culture to agential realism (Barad, 2007). Matter-meaning comes in to existence through iterative material-discursive intra-action (Barad, 2008) of phenomena. In agential realism the human is de-centred and is entangled with all matter that is human, and non-human. The study employs a diffractive ethico-onto-epistem-ological (Barad, 2007) methodology entailing a detailed reading of critical pedagogy, critical reflective practice and agential realist literature and theory, along with ‘re-turning’ (Barad, 2014) some reflective diaries kept by myself. The diaries were written during the teaching of a Masters level module on an early years programme which incorporated credits towards a professional qualification. Diffraction offers a way of thinking about, and doing, research and practice, and in this study materialised ‘propositions’ (Springghay, 2015) about ethical response-ability (Barad, 2010) in higher education pedagogical practice. These include, the classroom apparatus Barad (2007), artistic making, and reflection in diffraction.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/137537
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonThis this is embargoed until 23rd March 2026 as the author will be publishing their researchen_GB
dc.subjectPosthumanismen_GB
dc.subjectNew Materialismen_GB
dc.subjectHigher Education Teachingen_GB
dc.subjectEarly Yearsen_GB
dc.subjectDiffractionen_GB
dc.subjectSpeculative Fabulationen_GB
dc.subjectAgential Realismen_GB
dc.titleTeaching 'Early Years' in Higher Education: The ethical imperative of resistanceen_GB
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_GB
dc.date.available2024-09-25T14:52:51Z
dc.contributor.advisorStentiford, Lauren
dc.contributor.advisorHetherington, Lindsay
dc.publisher.departmentGraduate Research
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dc.type.degreetitleDoctor of Education
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoral
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctoral Thesis
rioxxterms.versionNAen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-09-23
rioxxterms.typeThesisen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record