Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPichegru, L
dc.contributor.authorSherley, RB
dc.contributor.authorMalan, T
dc.contributor.authorBarham, BJ
dc.contributor.authorLudynia, K
dc.contributor.authorGeldenhuys, D
dc.contributor.authorAmos, K
dc.contributor.authorBarham, PJ
dc.contributor.authorDrost, E
dc.contributor.authorHahndiek, V
dc.contributor.authorHufke, A
dc.contributor.authorHugo, C
dc.contributor.authorLawrence, C
dc.contributor.authorMcGeorge, C
dc.contributor.authorMcInnes, AM
dc.contributor.authorMakhado, AM
dc.contributor.authorMashau, M
dc.contributor.authorMilne, R
dc.contributor.authorPurves, A
dc.contributor.authorSlier, M
dc.contributor.authorvan der Merwe, C
dc.contributor.authorvan Wilgen, NJ
dc.contributor.authorWaller, L
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-18T09:08:42Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-16
dc.date.updated2024-10-18T08:54:29Z
dc.description.abstractAfrican penguins are among the most threatened seabird species globally and an African Penguin Biodiversity Management Plan (BMP) published in 2013 guides conservation strategies to prevent their extinction. To counter the impact of past guano exploitation which reduced the nesting habitat of these burrowing seabirds, rendering them vulnerable to predators and extreme weather events, a suite of artificial nests was deployed in various colonies over the past decades with varying success. The BMP called for new nest designs to maximise breeding output. This study assesses African penguin breeding success over the past 14 years in four types of artificial nests and in natural nests at all major colonies in South Africa. Overall, artificial nests outperformed natural nests and successfully increased breeding output of African penguins by 16.5% (95% CI: 6.7–26.2). No design was, however, consistently most effective across locations. For example, fibreglass nests had the poorest hatching success of all nest types at one colony (Bird Island), but outperformed cement nests at another (Boulders Beach). The latest design of double-layered ceramic nests tended to perform better than other artificial nests, although not consistently at all colonies and occupancy rates were low in some areas. Practical implication. The deployment of artificial nests proved to be a successful conservation measure for African penguins although the variety of habitats in the different colonies seems to have prevented a one solution-fits-all approach. The consistent poor breeding output in some areas in all nest types (<30% at the mainland colony in Simons' Town and the islands in Algoa Bay) further calls for colony-specific conservation strategies beyond artificial nests, while the continuous decline in African penguin numbers globally calls for broader measures urgently, primarily increasing access to their forage fish prey.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipAssociation of Zoos and Aquariumsen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCharl van der Merwe Trusten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Research Foundationen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipPew Fellows Program in Marine Conservationen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipLeiden Conservation Foundationen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSANCCOBen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSan Diego Zoo Wildlife Allianceen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 5, No. 4, article e12388en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12388
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/137707
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-7367-9315 (Sherley, RB)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley / British Ecological Societyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/ 10.5061/dryad.pg4f4qrzwen_GB
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). Ecological Solutions and Evidence published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectBiodiversity Management Planen_GB
dc.subjectbreeding successen_GB
dc.subjectclimate changeen_GB
dc.subjectconservation actionen_GB
dc.subjectendangered speciesen_GB
dc.subjectMayfield methoden_GB
dc.subjectpredationen_GB
dc.titleDecades of artificial nests towards African penguin conservation - Have they made a difference?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-10-18T09:08:42Z
dc.identifier.issn2688-8319
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Data available from the Dryad Digital Repository: https://doi.org/ 10.5061/dryad.pg4f4qrzw (Pichegru et al., 2024).en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEcological Solutions and Evidenceen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-06-25
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-10-16
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-10-18T09:05:03Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-10-18T09:09:22Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2024-10-16
exeter.rights-retention-statementNo


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2024 The Author(s). Ecological Solutions and Evidence published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2024 The Author(s). Ecological Solutions and Evidence published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,provided the original work is properly cited.