Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWoodley, E
dc.contributor.authorBarr, S
dc.contributor.authorBatty, L
dc.contributor.authorBickerstaff, K
dc.contributor.authorDarvill, C
dc.contributor.authorFerdous, R
dc.contributor.authorHolmes, N
dc.contributor.authorJon, I
dc.contributor.authorLynch, K
dc.contributor.authorMartin, J
dc.contributor.authorMarvell, A
dc.contributor.authorMcDougall, D
dc.contributor.authorPitt, H
dc.contributor.authorSingleton, A
dc.contributor.authorSouch, C
dc.contributor.authorYorke, L
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-24T13:02:20Z
dc.date.issued2024-11-11
dc.date.updated2024-10-24T10:47:54Z
dc.description.abstractField courses are widely regarded as integral to geography degree programmes, providing students with opportunities for experiential learning, often in unfamiliar international environments. Yet, this key area of pedagogy appears increasingly unsustainable and complex for Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) within the context of the urgent need for decarbonisation, increasing financial costs, and the institutional challenges of comprehensively embedding necessary Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) considerations into these activities. Here, we report on a national-level workshop (April 2024) that brought together a wide range of HE practitioners to discuss the future of UK field course pedagogy, using the fieldwork principles adopted by the Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) (RGS-IBG) in 2020 as a basis for framing future discourse. Using a Three Horizons approach to guide our conversations, we critically explored the (un)sustainability of current academic and institutional practices, alongside future directions and ‘disrupting’ (innovative) practices for promoting transformative change in this area of education. Here, we argue for two sector-wide discussions that require collaborative engagement with practitioners, institutions, and students. Firstly, we highlight the urgent need for transparent and critical reflection on the challenges and hypocrisy of aeromobility in academia and the need for more widespread adoption of low carbon (‘slower’) modes of travel. Secondly, we call for the immediate reconceptualization of field course pedagogy to place EDI considerations at the core of field course design and practice, aiding a transition towards Universal Design for Learning (UDL). As such, we call on the geography community in higher education to engage in critical reflection on how we take meaningful and urgent action to address the disconnect between our stated educational values around environmental sustainability and EDI, and our actual educational practices.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 11 (2), article e00158en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/geo2.158
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/137769
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley / Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers)en_GB
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). Geo: Geography and Environment published by the Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
dc.subjectField courseen_GB
dc.subjectpedagogyen_GB
dc.subjectsustainabilityen_GB
dc.subjectequalityen_GB
dc.subjectdiversityen_GB
dc.subjectinclusivityen_GB
dc.titleThe future of geography field course pedagogy in UK higher educationen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-10-24T13:02:20Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2054-4049
dc.identifier.journalGeo: Geography and Environmenten_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-10-18
dcterms.dateSubmitted2024-07-11
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-10-18
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-10-24T10:47:55Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2024-12-05T15:20:36Z
refterms.panelCen_GB
exeter.rights-retention-statementNo


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2024 The Author(s). Geo: Geography and Environment published by the Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2024 The Author(s). Geo: Geography and Environment published by the Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers) and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.