Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLira‐Martins, D
dc.contributor.authorXavier, RO
dc.contributor.authorMazzochini, GG
dc.contributor.authorVerona, LS
dc.contributor.authorAndreuccetti, T
dc.contributor.authorMartins, ÉS
dc.contributor.authorde Barros, FV
dc.contributor.authorFurtado, MN
dc.contributor.authorStein, B
dc.contributor.authorAbrahão, A
dc.contributor.authorSampaio, A
dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, I
dc.contributor.authorRowland, L
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, RS
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-28T13:51:10Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-22
dc.date.updated2024-10-28T09:59:43Z
dc.description.abstractThe Cerrado, South America's largest savanna, has acidic, nutrient‐poor soils and its native plants thrive under these conditions. However, abandoned pastures historically undergo changes in chemical properties due to interventions like liming and fertilizer use. This favors invasive African grasses and hinders native plants, impacting restoration efforts. In a Cerrado grassland undergoing restoration study, we tested whether soil acidification could restore native soil conditions and control invasives using 56 plots across 14 blocks. We hypothesized that decreased soil pH and nutrient availability would reduce invasive biomass and enhance diversity. We show that acidification reduced invasive biomass by 71%, with acidification negatively affecting invasives while sparing natives. Maintaining nutrient‐poor soil conditions can help to control invasive grasses in restoration projects, as fertilizer application can favor invasive species establishment. Soil acidification effectiveness depends on local nutrient levels. Areas with high soil cation content may require larger amendment quantities. Restoration strategies in nutrient‐poor ecosystems should aim recovering historical soil conditions to control invasives growth and support slow‐growing native plants.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFAPESPen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 22 October 2024en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/rec.14294
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/S000011/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/N014022/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber2019/07773-1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber2019/18176-4en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber2019/18145-1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber2019/23208-2en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/137807
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-0774-3216 (Rowland, Lucy)
dc.identifierScopusID: 55789919100 (Rowland, Lucy)
dc.language.isoen_USen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 22 October 2025 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2024 Society for Ecological Restoration.en_GB
dc.subjectCerrado restorationen_GB
dc.subjectfertilizer impactsen_GB
dc.subjectinvasive species controlen_GB
dc.subjectnutrient availabilityen_GB
dc.subjectsoil acidificationen_GB
dc.subjectspecies diversityen_GB
dc.titleSoil acidification controls invasive plant species in the restoration of degraded Cerrado grasslandsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-10-28T13:51:10Z
dc.identifier.issn1061-2971
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Wiley via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1526-100X
dc.identifier.journalRestoration Ecologyen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofRestoration Ecology
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-09-16
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-10-22
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-10-28T13:46:44Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelCen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2024-10-22
exeter.rights-retention-statementYes


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record