Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWilliams, AJ
dc.contributor.authorMesoudi, A
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-01T09:20:55Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-16
dc.date.updated2024-10-31T15:53:45Z
dc.description.abstractThe emergence of social complexity in human societies is a long-debated topic in archaeology, with competing hypotheses proposed and argued for using archaeological evidence. However, formal testing of these hypotheses is generally lacking. Here, we present and analyse an agent-based model to test the effect of environmental, resource, and social barriers to population movement – collectively known as ‘circumscription’ – on the rate of hierarchy formation. The results show that social circumscription is the largest driver of social complexity by increasing proximity between settlements. Environmental and resource circumscription can negatively impact the emergence of social complexity when the conditions separate the population spatially but can amplify social complexity when the conditions increase proximity between settlements. In providing a detailed test of the assumptions and predictions of circumscription theory, our abstract model provides insight into the conditions that are most likely to result in the emergence of social complexity in the real world.en_GB
dc.format.extent106090-
dc.identifier.citationVol. 172, article 106090en_GB
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2024.106090
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/137873
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0002-7740-1625 (Mesoudi, A)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rightsCrown Copyright © 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).en_GB
dc.subjectSocial complexityen_GB
dc.subjectAgent-based modellingen_GB
dc.subjectCircumscription theoryen_GB
dc.titleA formal test using agent-based models of the circumscription theory for the evolution of social complexityen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2024-11-01T09:20:55Z
dc.identifier.issn0305-4403
exeter.article-number106090
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1095-9238
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Archaeological Scienceen_GB
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Archaeological Science, 172
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-09-27
rioxxterms.funderNatural Environment Research Councilen_GB
rioxxterms.identifier.projectNE/L002434/1en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2024-10-16
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2024-11-01T09:17:30Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2024-11-01T09:26:46Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.dateFirstOnline2024-10-16
exeter.rights-retention-statementYes
rioxxterms.funder.projectd6f17585-c97b-44a2-99eb-c6cb875eed5aen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Crown Copyright © 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Crown Copyright © 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).