A qualitative study exploring depressed participants’ experiences of receiving Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT)
dc.contributor.author | Demetriou, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Widnall, E | |
dc.contributor.author | Warbrick, L | |
dc.contributor.author | Reed, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Marchant, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Geschwind, N | |
dc.contributor.author | Watson, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Magner-Parsons, B | |
dc.contributor.author | Barter, R | |
dc.contributor.author | Wright, K | |
dc.contributor.author | Dunn, BD | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-20T16:57:28Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025-02-05 | |
dc.date.updated | 2024-12-20T16:48:54Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: The current study aimed to explore participant views of acceptability, impact, and mechanism of change of Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT), a novel wellbeing-focused and recovery-oriented psychological therapy for depression. Design: A semi-structured qualitative interviews design was used, with data analysed using the framework approach. Participants: 20 participants with anhedonic depression who had received up to 20 sessions of ADepT, sampled from a pilot randomised controlled trial of ADepT versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT). Setting: A primary care psychological therapy clinic in Devon, UK, with interviews occurring between May 2018 and February 2020. Results: Participants found the wellbeing focus of ADepT acceptable. Helpful aspects of therapy were a positive therapeutic bond, the structure and flow of therapy scaffolding the learning journey, the tools and techniques of therapy helping building wellbeing, and booster sessions supporting long term recovery. Negative aspects for some participants were therapy feeling too intense and triggering feelings of failure. Participants reported significant positive impacts of treatment on wellbeing, functioning and hope. Perceived mechanisms of change were reorienting to the positive, engaging with valued goals, taking a proactive life stance, gaining confidence and motivation for change, breaking down tasks into small steps, cultivating self-care and self-compassion, enhancing help seeking and interpersonal effectiveness, changing the relationship to depression, and rediscovering the self beyond depression. Conclusions: Findings suggest that the wellbeing focus of ADepT is acceptable and leads to positive impacts, support the logic model underpinning the intervention, and warrant continuation to definitive trial. Trial registration: ISCRTN85278228, registered 27/03/2017 | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol.15, article e088726 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088726 | |
dc.identifier.grantnumber | CDF-2014-07-10 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/139416 | |
dc.identifier | ORCID: 0000-0002-0299-0920 (Dunn, Barnaby) | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | BMJ Publishing Group | en_GB |
dc.rights | © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | |
dc.subject | anhedonia | en_GB |
dc.subject | depression | en_GB |
dc.subject | wellbeing | en_GB |
dc.subject | Augmented Depression Therapy | en_GB |
dc.subject | qualitative | en_GB |
dc.title | A qualitative study exploring depressed participants’ experiences of receiving Augmented Depression Therapy (ADepT) | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2024-12-20T16:57:28Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2044-6055 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data Statement: No additional data are available. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | BMJ Open | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2024-12-19 | |
dcterms.dateSubmitted | 2024-05-13 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2024-12-19 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2024-12-20T16:48:56Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2025-02-10T12:53:02Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
exeter.rights-retention-statement | No |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.