Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNetz, C
dc.contributor.authorFawcett, TW
dc.contributor.authorHigginson, AD
dc.contributor.authorTaborsky, M
dc.contributor.authorTaborsky, B
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-08T13:55:33Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-20
dc.date.updated2025-01-08T12:38:51Z
dc.description.abstractDivision of labour (DoL) is most prominently observed in eusocial insects but also occurs in much smaller cooperative groups where all individuals could potentially perform any task. In such groups, previous experience and learning are the most important mechanisms underlying specialization. Using behavioural simulations, we investigate the dynamics of task specialization in groups of various sizes and with different constraints on the choice of task. We assume that individuals choose tasks by weighing their own competence to perform a task against the group requirement of how much that task needs to be performed. We find that task specialization occurs even if individuals choose tasks based solely on the group’s needs rather than their own competence. As large groups are less affected by demographic stochasticity, they can more accurately distribute labour across tasks, and individuals become more effective due to a reduced need to switch between tasks. This effect is enhanced if groups must perform a larger number of tasks. However, from an evolutionary point of view, individuals in larger groups develop a greater responsiveness to group requirements than those in small groups when labour variation carries a fitness penalty and thus will more readily switch between tasks. Small groups thus seem less able to distribute labour optimally over tasks through increased switching, and therefore evolve to ignore task imbalances up to a higher level before the threshold to switch between tasks is crossed. Further, we find that selection on learning ability is stronger in small than in large groups. We conclude that the reason why DoL may emerge more readily in large groups might not be due to a group-size effect on optimal decision-making, but rather because of a lower degree of variation of the labour distribution as a consequence of demographic stochasticity.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 380 (1922), article 20240206en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1098/rstb.2024.0206
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/139535
dc.identifierORCID: 0000-0001-6337-901X (Fawcett, Tim)
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherThe Royal Societyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14679143en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7690686
dc.rights© 2025 The Author(s). Open access. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.subjectDivision of labouren_GB
dc.subjectTask specialisationen_GB
dc.subjectLearningen_GB
dc.subjectGroup sizeen_GB
dc.titleGroup size and labour demands determine division of labour as a consequence of demographic stochasticityen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2025-01-08T13:55:33Z
dc.identifier.issn0962-8436
exeter.article-number20240206
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from the Royal Society via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData accessibility: Simulation model code and data analysis are available on Zenodo: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14679143 Supplementary material is available online: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7690686en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2970
dc.identifier.journalPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciencesen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2025-01-07
dcterms.dateSubmitted2024-05-25
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2025-01-07
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2025-01-08T12:38:52Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2025-04-15T14:34:02Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
exeter.rights-retention-statementNo


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2025 The Author(s). Open access. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2025 The Author(s). Open access. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.