Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity dynamics and commitment profiles of comparator clinical Radiography and related medical radiation science journals
dc.contributor.author | Agyenim-Boateng, O | |
dc.contributor.author | Rogers, C | |
dc.contributor.author | Hancock, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Akudjedu, TN | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-04-14T09:21:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025-04-11 | |
dc.date.updated | 2025-04-11T16:04:51Z | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction Medical radiation sciences (MRS) journals serve as the gatekeepers of knowledge within our professional field. This work sought to understand these professional journals’ current levels of commitment and the operational dynamics towards the principles of Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity (EDI), which can serve as barriers to equitable access to publishing and published evidence. Methods Seven MRS journals were purposively sampled for inclusion. Editorial statements relating to the included journals’ EDI position were identified through online searching. To ensure completeness, all editorial policies were searched for EDI-related content between May 18 to June 6, 2024. The Braun and Clarke thematic analysis methodology was employed to synthesise the statements. Results The Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences (JMIRS) and Radiography were the only two journals that had specific EDI statements which guide their operational practices. Alongside tipsRO, JMIRS and Radiography were also the only journals to provide recommendations and/or clear emphasis for the use of inclusive language in their author guidelines. Six key themes were established from the analysis of the two EDI statements: Commitment to Leadership and Editorial Diversity, Diversity Driving Scientific Excellence, Platforming Underrepresented Voices, Commitment to Health Equity, Disrupting Traditional Editorial Practices and Strategic Planning and Monitoring for EDI Progress. Disparity across the two journals was, however, evident. Conclusion Whilst some best practices were evidenced, there is an opportunity across all MRS journals to improve and enhance EDI commitments. Implications for practice Journals play a pivotal role in promoting equitable access to publishing and ensuring the dissemination of diverse perspectives that enrich scientific inquiry and practice. An EDI-friendly MRS research cycle is critical through the comprehensive adoption of regular audits and the implementation of targeted education policies. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 31 (3), article 102949 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2025.102949 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/140793 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier / The College of Radiographers | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The College of Radiographers. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) | en_GB |
dc.subject | Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) | en_GB |
dc.subject | Academic journals | en_GB |
dc.subject | Publishing practices | en_GB |
dc.subject | Editorial boards | en_GB |
dc.subject | Gender disparities | en_GB |
dc.subject | Diversity pledges | en_GB |
dc.title | Equality, Diversity and Inclusivity dynamics and commitment profiles of comparator clinical Radiography and related medical radiation science journals | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2025-04-14T09:21:14Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1078-8174 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Elsevier via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1078-8174 | |
dc.identifier.journal | Radiography | en_GB |
dc.relation.ispartof | Radiography, 31 | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2025-03-28 | |
dcterms.dateSubmitted | 2025-01-21 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2025-04-11 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2025-04-11T16:04:54Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | AM | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2025-04-14T09:21:25Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.dateFirstOnline | 2025-04-11 | |
exeter.rights-retention-statement | No |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The College of Radiographers. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)