This article responds to current uses and critiques of Ulrich Beck’s ‘risk society’ thesis by historians of science and medicine. Those who have deployed engaged with the concept of risk society concept have mainly been content to accept the fundamental categories of Beck’s analysis. In contrast, we argue that the Beck’s risk society ...
This article responds to current uses and critiques of Ulrich Beck’s ‘risk society’ thesis by historians of science and medicine. Those who have deployed engaged with the concept of risk society concept have mainly been content to accept the fundamental categories of Beck’s analysis. In contrast, we argue that the Beck’s risk society thesis underplays two key themes. Firstly, the role of capitalism and capitalist social relations as a the driver of technological change and the transformations in the reproduction of everyday life; and secondly, the ways in which hegemonic discourses of risk can be appropriated and transformed by counter-hegemonic forces. In place of ‘risk society’ we propose an approach based upon a ‘political ecology of risk’, which emphasizes the social relations that that are foundational to the everyday politics of environmental health.
