Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGriffin, J.G.L.
dc.contributor.authorKnapp, Karen M.
dc.contributor.authorPearce, G.
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-06T09:14:19Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.description.abstractIn-vitro cross-calibration of DXA scanning equipment, with a phantom device, has been recommended for assessing agreement between devices co-located within DXA scanning services. This study evaluated in-vivo and in-vitro cross-calibration of a static and a mobile DXA scanner within the same service in their individual clinical settings. 50 individuals from a volunteer group were recruited to take part in this study and had DXA measurements made on two GE Lunar Prodigy Advance (GE Lunar, Bedford, UK) scanners. Results in this study showed that the scanners agreed, with no clinically significant differences in BMD measurements made at the same site on the individual devices used in this study. The in-vivo cross-calibration of the instruments was a useful experience, which demonstrated closely calibrated systems and raised the profile of the bone densitometry service within the hospital.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 19 (1), pp. 7 - 10en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.radi.2012.08.005
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/14822
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWB Saundersen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2012.08.005en_GB
dc.subjectDXAen_GB
dc.subjectCross-calibrationen_GB
dc.subjectBone mineral densityen_GB
dc.subjectQuality assuranceen_GB
dc.subjectClinical practiceen_GB
dc.subjectOsteoporosisen_GB
dc.titleStatic and mobile DXA scanner in-vivo cross-calibration studyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2014-05-06T09:14:19Z
dc.identifier.issn1078-8174
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2012 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Radiography. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Radiography Vol. 19 (2013), DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2012.08.005en_GB
dc.identifier.journalRadiographyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record