Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEggleton, P
dc.contributor.authorUkoumunne, Obioha C.
dc.contributor.authorCottrell, I
dc.contributor.authorKhan, A
dc.contributor.authorMaqsood, S
dc.contributor.authorThornes, J
dc.contributor.authorPerry, E
dc.contributor.authorIsenberg, D
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-06T13:23:41Z
dc.date.issued2014-04-22
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of C1q autoantibodies in identifying lupus nephritis (LN) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Data Sources and methods: Citation indexes were searched and 370 articles published from 1977 to 2013 were evaluated. The 31 selected studies included in the meta-analysis were cross-sectional in design. Among the 31 studies, 28 compared anti-C1q antibodies in 2769 SLE patients including those with (n = 1442) and without a history of LN (n = 1327). Nine studies examined anti-C1q in 517 SLE patients with active (n = 249) and inactive LN (n = 268). Hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) random effects models were fitted to pool estimates of accuracy across the studies. Results: Anti-C1q antibodies discriminated between patients with and without a history of LN, with a median specificity of 73.5%. The HSROC model estimated the corresponding sensitivity to be 70.4%. A hypothetical patient with a 55% prior probability of having a history of LN as opposed to no history (the median prevalence across 28 eligible studies) would have a post-test probability of 76.4% following a positive test result (positive predictive value) or 33.0% following a negative test result (negative predictive value). For differentiating active from inactive LN the median specificity of anti-C1q antibodies was 80%, with a corresponding estimated sensitivity value 75.7% based on the HSROC model. A hypothetical patient with a 56% prior probability of active as opposed to inactive LN (the median prevalence across the 9 eligible studies) would have a post-test probability of 82.8% following a positive test result or 27.9% following a negative test result. Conclusions: Although C1q antibodies are associated with lupus nephritis the post-test probabilities are not sufficiently convincing to provide reasonable certainty of the presence or absence of history of disease/active disease.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipArthritis Research UKen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipPeninsula Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Health Service South West, funded by the National Institute for Health Research, UKen_GB
dc.identifier.citationJournal of clinical and cellular immunology (2014) Vol. 5, Issue 2en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.4172/2155-9899.1000210
dc.identifier.grantnumber19894en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/14957
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherOMICS Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://omicsonline.org/clinical-cellular-immunology.phpen_GB
dc.rights© 2014 Eggleton P, et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_GB
dc.subjectAutoantibodyen_GB
dc.subjectBiopsyen_GB
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_GB
dc.subjectELISAen_GB
dc.subjectHierarchical summary receiver operating characteristicen_GB
dc.subjectC1qen_GB
dc.subjectsystemic lupus erythematosusen_GB
dc.titleAutoantibodies against C1q as a diagnostic measure of lupus nephritis:systematic review and meta-analysisen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2014-06-06T13:23:41Z
dc.contributor.editorSu, K
dc.descriptionThis is a freely-available open access publication. Please cite the published version which is available via the DOI link in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of clinical and cellular immunologyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record