Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSrinivasan, K
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-20T08:18:51Z
dc.date.issued2014-06
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores turtle conservation in Odisha, India, to map the complicated ways in which animal well-being is pursued in the contemporary world. Using insights from Foucault’s work on biopolitics, it offers an account of conservation as population politics, questioning the entanglement of harm and care that infuses this space of more-than-human social change. In doing this, the paper elaborates the concept of agential subjectification in order to track the mechanisms that underlie the asymmetric circulation of biopower in human–animal interactions and to develop Foucauldian scholarship for the examination of present-day manifestations of the ‘will to improve’.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipRGS‑IBGen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCulture and Animals Foundationen_GB
dc.identifier.citation2014, Vol. 32, Issue 3, pp. 501 - 517en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1068/d13101p
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/15056
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPionen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.envplan.com/abstract.cgi?id=d13101pen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher's Policyen_GB
dc.subjectconservationen_GB
dc.subjectenvironmenten_GB
dc.subjectFoucaulten_GB
dc.subjectanimalen_GB
dc.subjectbiopoweren_GB
dc.subjectmore-than-humanen_GB
dc.titleCaring for the collective: biopower and agential subjectification in wildlife conservationen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0263-7758
dc.descriptiontypes: Articleen_GB
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2014 Pionen_GB
dc.descriptionPost Print. Srinivasan, K. 2014. The definitive, peer-reviewed and edited version of this article is published in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 32, Issue 3, pp. 501 – 517 DOI:10.1068/d13101pen_GB
dc.identifier.journalEnvironment and Planning D: Society and Spaceen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record