Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorIbanez, Ines
dc.contributor.authorDiez, Jeffrey M.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Luke P.
dc.contributor.authorOlden, Julian D.
dc.contributor.authorSorte, Cascade J.B.
dc.contributor.authorBlumenthal, Dana M.
dc.contributor.authorBradley, Bethany A.
dc.contributor.authorD'Antonio, Carla M.
dc.contributor.authorDukes, Jeffrey S.
dc.contributor.authorEarly, Regan
dc.contributor.authorGrosholz, Edwin D.
dc.contributor.authorLawler, Joshua J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-29T17:23:53Z
dc.date.issued2014-01
dc.description.abstractAs the main witnesses of the ecological and economic impacts of invasions on ecosystems around the world, ecologists seek to provide the relevant science that informs managers about the potential for invasion of specific organisms in their region(s) of interest. Yet, the assorted literature that could inform such forecasts is rarely integrated to do so, and further, the diverse nature of the data available complicates synthesis and quantitative prediction. Here we present a set of analytical tools for synthesizing different levels of distributional and/or demographic data to produce meaningful assessments of invasion potential that can guide management at multiple phases of ongoing invasions, from dispersal to colonization to proliferation. We illustrate the utility of data-synthesis and data-model assimilation approaches with case studies of three well-known invasive species—a vine, a marine mussel, and a freshwater crayfish—under current and projected future climatic conditions. Results from the integrated assessments reflect the complexity of the invasion process and show that the most relevant climatic variables can have contrasting effects or operate at different intensities across habitat types. As a consequence, for two of the study species climate trends will increase the likelihood of invasion in some habitats and decrease it in others. Our results identified and quantified both bottlenecks and windows of opportunity for invasion, mainly related to the role of human uses of the landscape or to disruption of the flow of resources. The approach we describe has a high potential to enhance model realism, explanatory insight, and predictive capability, generating information that can inform management decisions and optimize phase-specific prevention and control efforts for a wide range of biological invasions.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 24, Issue 1, pp. 25 - 37en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1890/13-0776.1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/15774
dc.publisherEcological Society of Americaen_GB
dc.subjectCelastrus orbiculatusen_GB
dc.subjectdemographic frameworken_GB
dc.subjecthierarchical Bayesian modelsen_GB
dc.subjectinvasive species managementen_GB
dc.subjectMytilus galloprovincialisen_GB
dc.subjectOrconectes rusticusen_GB
dc.subjectrisk assessmenten_GB
dc.subjectdispersal phaseen_GB
dc.subjectcolonization phaseen_GB
dc.subjectmultiple scalesen_GB
dc.titleIntegrated assessment of biological invasionsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2014-10-29T17:23:53Z
dc.identifier.issn1051-0761
dc.descriptionCopyright by the Ecological Society of America Inés Ibáñez, Jeffrey M. Diez, Luke P. Miller, Julian D. Olden, Cascade J. B. Sorte, Dana M. Blumenthal, Bethany A. Bradley, Carla M. D'Antonio, Jeffrey S. Dukes, Regan I. Early, Edwin D. Grosholz, and Joshua J. Lawler 2014. Integrated assessment of biological invasions. Ecological Applications 24:25–37en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEcological Applicationsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record