Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLuscombe, David J.
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, K
dc.contributor.authorGatis, Naomi
dc.contributor.authorWetherelt, A
dc.contributor.authorGrand-Clement, Emilie
dc.contributor.authorBrazier, Richard E.
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-08T10:27:08Z
dc.date.issued2014-08-01
dc.description.abstractAirborne laser scanning systems (Light Detection And Ranging, LiDAR) are very well suited to the study of landscape and vegetation structure over large extents. Spatially distributed measurements describing the three-dimensional character of landscape surfaces and vegetation architecture can be used to understand eco-geomorphic and ecohydrological processes, and this is particularly pertinent in peatlands given the increasing recognition that these landscapes provide a variety of ecosystem services (water provision, flood mitigation and carbon sequestration). In using LiDAR data for monitoring peatlands, it is important to understand how well peatland surface structures (with fine length scales) can be described. Our approach integrates two laser scanning technologies, namely terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and airborne LiDAR surveys, to assess how effective airborne LiDAR is at measuring these fine-scale microtopographic ecohydrological structures. By combining airborne and TLS, we demonstrate an improved spatial understanding of the signal measured by the airborne LiDAR. Critically, results demonstrate that LiDAR digital surface models are subject to specific errors related to short-sward ecosystem structure, causing the vegetation canopy height and surface-drainage network depth to be underestimated. TLS is shown to be effective at describing these structures over small extents, allowing the information content and accuracy of airborne LiDAR to be understood and quantified more appropriately. These findings have important implications for the appropriate degree of confidence ecohydrologists can apply to such data when using them as a surrogate for field measurements. They also illustrate the need to couple LiDAR data with ground validation data in order to improve assessment of ecohydrological function in such landscapes. © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSouth West Water Ltden_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 8 (4), pp. 584-594en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/eco.1527
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/17141
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eco.1527/abstracten_GB
dc.rightsThis is the pre-print version of the following article: Luscombe, D. J., Anderson, K., Gatis, N., Wetherelt, A., Grand-Clement, E. and Brazier, R. E. (2014), What does airborne LiDAR really measure in upland ecosystems?. Ecohydrol.. doi: 10.1002/eco.1527, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eco.1527en_GB
dc.subjectDSMen_GB
dc.subjectEcohydrologyen_GB
dc.subjectEcosystem servicesen_GB
dc.subjectExmooren_GB
dc.subjectLiDARen_GB
dc.subjectPeatlandsen_GB
dc.subjectTerrestrial laser scanningen_GB
dc.subjectUKen_GB
dc.subjectUncertaintyen_GB
dc.subjectUplandsen_GB
dc.titleWhat does airborne LiDAR really measure in upland ecosystems?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2015-05-08T10:27:08Z
dc.identifier.issn1936-0584
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEcohydrologyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record