Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMurdoch, J
dc.contributor.authorVarley, A
dc.contributor.authorFletcher, E
dc.contributor.authorBritten, Nicky
dc.contributor.authorPrice, L
dc.contributor.authorCalitri, R
dc.contributor.authorGreen, C
dc.contributor.authorLattimer, V
dc.contributor.authorRichards, SH
dc.contributor.authorRichards, David
dc.contributor.authorSalisbury, C
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Rod S.
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, John
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-12T08:38:28Z
dc.date.issued2015-04-10
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Telephone triage represents one strategy to manage demand for face-to-face GP appointments in primary care. However, limited evidence exists of the challenges GP practices face in implementing telephone triage. We conducted a qualitative process evaluation alongside a UK-based cluster randomised trial (ESTEEM) which compared the impact of GP-led and nurse-led telephone triage with usual care on primary care workload, cost, patient experience, and safety for patients requesting a same-day GP consultation. The aim of the process study was to provide insights into the observed effects of the ESTEEM trial from the perspectives of staff and patients, and to specify the circumstances under which triage is likely to be successfully implemented. Here we report perspectives of staff. METHODS: The intervention comprised implementation of either GP-led or nurse-led telephone triage for a period of 2-3 months. A qualitative evaluation was conducted using staff interviews recruited from eight general practices (4 GP triage, 4 Nurse triage) in the UK, implementing triage as part of the ESTEEM trial. Qualitative interviews were undertaken with 44 staff members in GP triage and nurse triage practices (16 GPs, 8 nurses, 7 practice managers, 13 administrative staff). RESULTS: Staff reported diverse experiences and perceptions regarding the implementation of telephone triage, its effects on workload, and on the benefits of triage. Such diversity were explained by the different ways triage was organised, the staffing models used to support triage, how the introduction of triage was communicated across practice staff, and by how staff roles were reconfigured as a result of implementing triage. CONCLUSION: The findings from the process evaluation offer insight into the range of ways GP practices participating in ESTEEM implemented telephone triage, and the circumstances under which telephone triage can be successfully implemented beyond the context of a clinical trial. Staff experiences and perceptions of telephone triage are shaped by the way practices communicate with staff, prepare for and sustain the changes required to implement triage effectively, as well as by existing practice culture, and staff and patient behaviour arising in response to the changes made. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN20687662 . Registered 28 May 2009.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNIHR Health Technology Assessment programmeen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 16 (1), article 47en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12875-015-0263-4
dc.identifier.grantnumber08/53/15en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/17503
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887747en_GB
dc.rights© 2015 Murdoch et al.; licensee Biomed Central. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_GB
dc.titleImplementing telephone triage in general practice: a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trialen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2015-06-12T08:38:28Z
dc.identifier.issn1471-2296
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is a freely-available open access publication. Please cite the published version which is available via the DOI link in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMC Family Practiceen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record