Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPentecost, C
dc.contributor.authorFarrand, Paul
dc.contributor.authorGreaves, CJ
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, Rod S.
dc.contributor.authorWarren, FC
dc.contributor.authorHillsdon, Melvyn
dc.contributor.authorGreen, C
dc.contributor.authorWelsman, JR
dc.contributor.authorRayson, K
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Philip H
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, AH
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-21T08:10:30Z
dc.date.issued2015-08-20
dc.description.abstractBackground Depression is associated with physical inactivity, which may mediate the relationship between depression and a range of chronic physical health conditions. However, few interventions have combined a psychological intervention for depression with behaviour change techniques, such as behavioural activation (BA), to promote increased physical activity. Methods To determine procedural and clinical uncertainties to inform a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT), a pilot parallel-group RCT was undertaken within two Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services in South West England. We aimed to recruit 80 adults with depression and randomise them to a supported, written self-help programme based on either BA or BA plus physical activity promotion (BAcPAc). Data were collected at baseline and 4 months post-randomisation to evaluate trial retention, intervention uptake and variance in outcomes to inform a sample size calculation. Qualitative data were collected from participants and psychological wellbeing practitioners (PWPs) to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the trial methods and the intervention. Routine data were collected to evaluate resource use and cost. Results Sixty people with depression were recruited, and a 73 % follow-up rate was achieved. Accelerometer physical activity data were collected for 64 % of those followed. Twenty participants (33 %) attended at least one treatment appointment. Interview data were analysed for 15 participants and 9 study PWPs. The study highlighted the challenges of conducting an RCT within existing IAPT services with high staff turnover and absences, participant scheduling issues, PWP and participant preferences for cognitive focussed treatment, and deviations from BA delivery protocols. The BAcPAc intervention was generally acceptable to patients and PWPs. Conclusions Although recruitment procedures and data collection were challenging, participants generally engaged with the BAcPAc self-help booklets and reported willingness to increase their physical activity. A number of feasibility issues were identified, in particular the under-use of BA as a treatment for depression, the difficulty that PWPs had in adapting their existing procedures for study purposes and the instability of the IAPT PWP workforce. These problems would need to be better understood and resolved before proceeding to a full-scale RCT.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Prevention Research Initiative phase 4en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMRCen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipAlzheimer’s Research Trusten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipAlzheimer’s Societyen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBBSRCen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBritish Heart Foundationen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCancer Research UKen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipChief Scientist Office - Scottish Government Health Directorate, Department of Healthen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDiabetes UKen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipESRCen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEPSRCen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipHealth and Social Care Research Division, Public Health Agency, Northern Irelanden_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipStroke Associationen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWellcome Trusten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWelsh Governmenten_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWorld Cancer Research Funden_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNIHRen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 16, article 367en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13063-015-0881-0
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/18096
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.trialsjournal.com/content/16/1/367en_GB
dc.rightsOpen Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_GB
dc.subjectBehavioural Activationen_GB
dc.subjectIAPTen_GB
dc.subjectlow-intensity Cognitave Behavioural Therapyen_GB
dc.subjectmixed methodsen_GB
dc.subjectphysical activityen_GB
dc.subjectpilot RCTen_GB
dc.subjectqualitativeen_GB
dc.subjectself-helpen_GB
dc.subjecttrialen_GB
dc.titleCombining behavioural activation with physical activity promotion for adults with depression: findings of a parallel-group pilot randomised controlled trial (BAcPAc)en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2015-08-21T08:10:30Z
dc.identifier.issn1745-6215
exeter.place-of-publicationUK
dc.descriptionPublisheden_GB
dc.descriptionClaire Pentecost University of Exeter Medical School Complex Interventions Heavitree Road Exeter Devon EX1 2LU United Kingdomen_GB
dc.descriptionArticleen_GB
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2015 Pentecost et al.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalTrialsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record