Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDavies, Thomas W.
dc.contributor.authorJenkins, Stuart R.
dc.contributor.authorKingham, Rachel
dc.contributor.authorKenworthy, Joseph
dc.contributor.authorHawkins, Stephen J.
dc.contributor.authorHiddink, Jan G.
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-01T12:15:17Z
dc.date.issued2011-12-11
dc.description.abstractKey ecosystem processes such as carbon and nutrient cycling could be deteriorating as a result of biodiversity loss. However, currently we lack the ability to predict the consequences of realistic species loss on ecosystem processes. The aim of this study was to test whether species contributions to community biomass can be used as surrogate measures of their contribution to ecosystem processes. These were gross community productivity in a salt marsh plant assemblage and an intertidal macroalgae assemblage; community clearance of microalgae in sessile suspension feeding invertebrate assemblage; and nutrient uptake in an intertidal macroalgae assemblage. We conducted a series of biodiversity manipulations that represented realistic species extinction sequences in each of the three contrasting assemblages. Species were removed in a subtractive fashion so that biomass was allowed to vary with each species removal, and key ecosystem processes were measured at each stage of community disassembly. The functional contribution of species was directly proportional to their contribution to community biomass in a 1:1 ratio, a relationship that was consistent across three contrasting marine ecosystems and three ecosystem processes. This suggests that the biomass contributed by a species to an assemblage can be used to approximately predict the proportional decline in an ecosystem process when that species is lost. Such predictions represent "worst case scenarios" because, over time, extinction resilient species can offset the loss of biomass associated with the extinction of competitors. We also modelled a "best case scenario" that accounts for compensatory responses by the extant species with the highest per capita contribution to ecosystem processes. These worst and best case scenarios could be used to predict the minimum and maximum species required to sustain threshold values of ecosystem processes in the future.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMarine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (MBA)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDr Richard Thompson, University of Plymouth, UKen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 6 (12): e28362en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0028362
dc.identifier.grantnumberG00226en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/18158
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22163297en_GB
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2011 Davies et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_GB
dc.subjectAlgorithmsen_GB
dc.subjectAnimalsen_GB
dc.subjectBiodiversityen_GB
dc.subjectBiomassen_GB
dc.subjectConservation of Natural Resourcesen_GB
dc.subjectEcosystemen_GB
dc.subjectEnvironmental Monitoringen_GB
dc.subjectExtinction, Biologicalen_GB
dc.subjectFood Chainen_GB
dc.subjectGreat Britainen_GB
dc.subjectInvertebratesen_GB
dc.subjectMarine Biologyen_GB
dc.subjectPlantsen_GB
dc.subjectPopulation Densityen_GB
dc.subjectPopulation Dynamicsen_GB
dc.subjectSeawateren_GB
dc.subjectSeaweeden_GB
dc.titleDominance, biomass and extinction resistance determine the consequences of biodiversity loss for multiple coastal ecosystem processesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2015-09-01T12:15:17Z
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited States
dc.identifier.journalPLoS Oneen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record