Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartin, M.P.
dc.contributor.authorOrton, T.G.
dc.contributor.authorLacarce, E.
dc.contributor.authorMeersmans, J
dc.contributor.authorSaby, N.P.A.
dc.contributor.authorParoissien, J.B.
dc.contributor.authorJolivet, C.
dc.contributor.authorBoulonne, L.
dc.contributor.authorArrouays, D.
dc.date.accessioned2015-09-23T12:00:28Z
dc.date.issued2014-07
dc.description.abstractSoil organic carbon (SOC) plays a major role in the global carbon budget. It can act as a source or a sink of atmospheric carbon, thereby possibly influencing the course of climate change. Improving the tools that model the spatial distributions of SOC stocks at national scales is a priority, both for monitoring changes in SOC and as an input for global carbon cycles studies. In this paper, we compare and evaluate two recent and promising modelling approaches. First, we considered several increasingly complex boosted regression trees (BRT), a convenient and efficient multiple regression model from the statistical learning field. Further, we considered a robust geostatistical approach coupled to the BRT models. Testing the different approaches was performed on the dataset from the French Soil Monitoring Network, with a consistent cross-validation procedure. We showed that when a limited number of predictors were included in the BRT model, the standalone BRT predictions were significantly improved by robust geostatistical modelling of the residuals. However, when data for several SOC drivers were included, the standalone BRT model predictions were not significantly improved by geostatistical modelling. Therefore, in this latter situation, the BRT predictions might be considered adequate without the need for geostatistical modelling, provided that i) care is exercised in model fitting and validating, and ii) the dataset does not allow for modelling of local spatial autocorrelations, as is the case for many national systematic sampling schemes. © 2014 Elsevier B.V.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFrench Scientific Group of Interest on soils: the GIS Solen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFrench Ministry of Ecology, Sustainable Development and Energy (MEDDE)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFrench Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Forestry (MAAF)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipFrench Agency for Environment and Energy Management (ADEME)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipInstitute for Research and Development (IRD)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Geographic and Forest Information (IGN)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Agronomic Research (INRA)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEU project “Greenhouse gas management in European land use systems (GHG-Europe)”en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 223-225, pp. 97 - 107en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.01.005
dc.identifier.grantnumberFP7-ENV-2009-1-244122en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/18304
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rightsAccepted manuscript: © 2014, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dc.subjectBoosted regression treesen_GB
dc.subjectGeostatisticsen_GB
dc.subjectNational accountingen_GB
dc.subjectSoil organic carbonen_GB
dc.subjectSpatial distributionsen_GB
dc.titleEvaluation of modelling approaches for predicting the spatial distribution of soil organic carbon stocks at the national scaleen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2015-09-23T12:00:28Z
dc.identifier.issn0016-7061
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2014 Elsevier. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Geoderma. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Geoderma (2014), DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.01.005en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1872-6259
dc.identifier.journalGeodermaen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record