Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHerduin, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorBanfield, Stephen
dc.contributor.authorWeller, S.D.
dc.contributor.authorThies, Philipp R.
dc.contributor.authorJohanning, Lars
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-23T13:55:34Z
dc.date.issued2015-11-18
dc.description.abstractThe interaction between fibre rope and steel parts on vessels (fairlead and roller) is technically well understood but not commonly published in codes or practised by mariners. What appears to be a smooth steel surface to the naked eye can still be abrasive medium to synthetic mooring components. There are very few reports of external rope abrasion tests in the literature. The surface finish at the contact between the rope and the steel guide can cause damage and consequently prematurely degrade the exposed yarns of the rope and thus reduce the overall load bearing capacity of the rope. The ISO 18692 standard [1] recommends that prolonged cycling of a rope around rollers should be avoided, however it is specified that occasional bending and running over rollers is allowable. There are two guides to specify surface roughness. MEG 3 [2] states that steel fairleads should be polished to Ra10, but in practice this may be difficult to achieve or obtain with carbon steel. US Navy guide also states that the surface of steel should have better than 125 μi or 3.2Ra [3]. The study presented here discusses the bending of a synthetic rope around a roller during transportation. It relates the motion behaviour of the vessel to rope wear and provides a detailed numerical simulation correlated with post analysis of the rope after the failure. The investigations show that the roughness of the steel roller caused the abrasion of the rope and was exacerbated through the vessel dynamics, leaving a residual strength of 14% MBL, before rupture. The experimental tests have established a linear behaviour between strength loss and surface roughness and it was observed that the abrasion mainly occurs in the early stages of load cycling. The presented work recommends the use of lubricated nylon or polished stainless steel instead of carbon steel rollers to limit abrasive rope wear. The paper also devises a methodology to carefully assess and quantify potential rope abrasion to ensure that the residual rope strength withstands the required load capacity.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMarine Renewables Commercialisation Fund (MRCF) administrated by the Carbon Trust under the Array Technology Innovation Programmeen_GB
dc.identifier.citationEngineering Failure Analysis, 2016, Volume 60, pp.137-154en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.037
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/18517
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher's policyen_GB
dc.rightsAccepted manuscript: © 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dc.subjectAbrasionen_GB
dc.subjectPolyester ropeen_GB
dc.subjectMRE commissioningen_GB
dc.subjectSea trialen_GB
dc.subjectOrcaFlexen_GB
dc.titleAbrasion process between a fibre mooring line and a corroded steel element during the transit and commissioning of a Marine Renewable Energy deviceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1350-6307
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2015 Elsevier. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Engineering Failure Analysis. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol 60, (2016)] DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.037en_GB
dc.identifier.journalEngineering Failure Analysisen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record