dc.contributor.author | Herduin, Manuel | |
dc.contributor.author | Banfield, Stephen | |
dc.contributor.author | Weller, S.D. | |
dc.contributor.author | Thies, Philipp R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Johanning, Lars | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-10-23T13:55:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-11-18 | |
dc.description.abstract | The interaction between fibre rope and steel parts on vessels (fairlead and roller) is technically well understood but not commonly published in codes or practised by mariners. What appears to be a smooth steel surface to the naked eye can still be abrasive medium to synthetic mooring components. There are very few reports of external rope abrasion tests in the literature. The surface finish at the contact between the rope and the steel guide can cause damage and consequently prematurely degrade the exposed yarns of the rope and thus reduce the overall load bearing capacity of the rope. The ISO 18692 standard [1] recommends that prolonged cycling of a rope around rollers should be avoided, however it is specified that occasional bending and running over rollers is allowable. There are two guides to specify surface roughness. MEG 3 [2] states that steel fairleads should be polished to Ra10, but in practice this may be difficult to achieve or obtain with carbon steel. US Navy guide also states that the surface of steel should have better than 125 μi or 3.2Ra [3]. The study presented here discusses the bending of a synthetic rope around a roller during transportation. It relates the motion behaviour of the vessel to rope wear and provides a detailed numerical simulation correlated with post analysis of the rope after the failure. The investigations show that the roughness of the steel roller caused the abrasion of the rope and was exacerbated through the vessel dynamics, leaving a residual strength of 14% MBL, before rupture. The experimental tests have established a linear behaviour between strength loss and surface roughness and it was observed that the abrasion mainly occurs in the early stages of load cycling. The presented work recommends the use of lubricated nylon or polished stainless steel instead of carbon steel rollers to limit abrasive rope wear. The paper also devises a methodology to carefully assess and quantify potential rope abrasion to ensure that the residual rope strength withstands the required load capacity. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Marine Renewables Commercialisation Fund (MRCF) administrated by the Carbon Trust under the Array Technology Innovation Programme | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Engineering Failure Analysis, 2016, Volume 60, pp.137-154 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.037 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/18517 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoreason | Publisher's policy | en_GB |
dc.rights | Accepted manuscript: © 2015, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | en_GB |
dc.subject | Abrasion | en_GB |
dc.subject | Polyester rope | en_GB |
dc.subject | MRE commissioning | en_GB |
dc.subject | Sea trial | en_GB |
dc.subject | OrcaFlex | en_GB |
dc.title | Abrasion process between a fibre mooring line and a corroded steel element during the transit and commissioning of a Marine Renewable Energy device | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn | 1350-6307 | |
dc.description | Copyright © 2015 Elsevier. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Engineering Failure Analysis. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol 60, (2016)] DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.11.037 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Engineering Failure Analysis | en_GB |