Model inter-comparison between statistical and dynamic model assessments of the long-term stability of blanket peat in Great Britain (1940-2099)
Clark, JM; Billett, MF; Coyle, M; et al.Croft, S; Daniels, S; Evans, CD; Evans, M; Freeman, Chris; Gallego-Sala, Angela V.; Heinemeyer, A; House, JI; Monteith, DT; Nayak, D; Orr, Harriet G.; Prentice, I. Colin; Rose, R; Rowson, J; Smith, JU; Smith, P; Tun, YM; Vanguelova, E; Wetterhall, F; Worrall, F
Date: 30 December 2010
Article
Journal
Climate Research
Publisher
Inter Research
Publisher DOI
Related links
Abstract
We compared output from 3 dynamic process-based models (DMs: ECOSSE, MILLENNIA and the Durham Carbon Model) and 9 bioclimatic envelope models (BCEMs; including BBOG ensemble and PEATSTASH) ranging from simple threshold to semi-process-based models. Model simulations were run at 4 British peatland sites using historical climate data and ...
We compared output from 3 dynamic process-based models (DMs: ECOSSE, MILLENNIA and the Durham Carbon Model) and 9 bioclimatic envelope models (BCEMs; including BBOG ensemble and PEATSTASH) ranging from simple threshold to semi-process-based models. Model simulations were run at 4 British peatland sites using historical climate data and climate projections under a medium (A1B) emissions scenario from the 11-RCM (regional climate model) ensemble underpinning UKCP09. The models showed that blanket peatlands are vulnerable to projected climate change; however, predictions varied between models as well as between sites. All BCEMs predicted a shift from presence to absence of a climate associated with blanket peat, where the sites with the lowest total annual precipitation were closest to the presence/absence threshold. DMs showed a more variable response. ECOSSE predicted a decline in net C sink and shift to net C source by the end of this century. The Durham Carbon Model predicted a smaller decline in the net C sink strength, but no shift to net C source. MILLENNIA predicted a slight overall increase in the net C sink. In contrast to the BCEM projections, the DMs predicted that the sites with coolest temperatures and greatest total annual precipitation showed the largest change in carbon sinks. In this model inter-comparison, the greatest variation in model output in response to climate change projections was not between the BCEMs and DMs but between the DMs themselves, because of different approaches to modelling soil organic matter pools and decomposition amongst other processes. The difference in the sign of the response has major implications for future climate feedbacks, climate policy and peatland management. Enhanced data collection, in particular monitoring peatland response to current change, would significantly improve model development and projections of future change. © Inter-Research 2010.
Geography - old structure
Collections of Former Colleges
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
What is in a Model? Using Theoretical and Material Models to Develop Intelligible Theories
Leonelli, Sabina (MIT Press, 2007) -
Mathematical modelling for bidirectional motor-mediated motility in a fungal model system
Lin, Congping (University of Exeter Biosciences, 19 July 2012)In Ustilago maydis hyphae, bidirectional transport of early endosomes (EEs) occurs on microtubules (MTs) that have plus and minus ends. The transport is powered by kinesin-3 towards the plus ends of MTs and dynein towards ... -
The Ontology of Theoretical Modelling: Models as Make-Believe
Toon, Adam (Springer, 1 January 2010)The descriptions and theoretical laws scientists write down when they model a system are often false of any real system. And yet we commonly talk as if there were objects that satisfy the scientists’ assumptions and as if ...