Home | Contact us | Staff | Students | MyExeter (Staff) | exehub (Students) | Site map |

      StudyingResearchBusiness and communityWorking hereAlumni and supportersOur departmentsVisiting usAbout us

      Open Research Exeter (ORE)

      View Item 
      •   ORE Home
      • University of Exeter Theses
      • Doctoral Theses
      • View Item
      •   ORE Home
      • University of Exeter Theses
      • Doctoral Theses
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Consociational conflict transformation: Ethno-national identity in post-Good Friday Agreement Northern Ireland

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      JarrettH.pdf (1.244Mb)
      Date
      2015-08-24
      Author
      Jarrett, Henry
      Date issued
      2015-08-24
      Type
      Thesis or dissertation
      Language
      en
      Publisher
      University of Exeter
      Embargo
      2020-08-24
      Reason for embargo
      To allow for publications.
      Abstract
      The case of Northern Ireland is heralded by many as a consociational success story. Since the signing of the Good Friday (Belfast) Agreement in 1998, significant conflict transformation has taken place in the form of a considerable reduction in levels of violence and the establishment of power sharing between unionists and nationalists. This thesis, however, asks whether consociational arrangements are transforming conflict in a different way: through mitigating the salience of ethno-national identities. It argues that if this is taking place, it would be demonstrated in the focus of the election campaigns of Northern Ireland’s political parties, which would be almost exclusively based around socio-economic issues affecting the whole population, rather than narrow single identity concerns. Elections contested using Proportional Representation – Single Transferable Vote (PR-STV) offer the greatest potential to induce moderation, as this electoral system is preferential and allows inter-party lower order preference votes (or transfers) to be cast. It should, therefore, be in the interest of parties to maximise their support by moderating their campaigns with the intention of attracting inter-bloc transfers. If this is occurring, it would demonstrate a shift from traditional unionist versus nationalist politics to a more inclusive political system that is less concerned with ethno-national divisions. On the whole, however, this has not been realised. Although election campaigns are today less strident than they were in the pre-1998 era, it remains the case that they usually foreground single identity symbolism, as it is this that resonates with voters. Whilst consociational power sharing has been very successful in reducing levels of violent conflict and facilitating elite level cooperation between unionists and nationalists, it has been much less successful in reducing divisions within wider society. This indicates a dissonance between ‘high’ politics and society in Northern Ireland. The conclusions of this thesis also highlight a disparity between what political theory argues may happen and what actually does, as demonstrated by the practice of politics. It is the novel way in which this research tests its hypothesis that makes an original contribution to knowledge. This is achieved through the unique application of ethno-symbolism to analyse political party election campaigns.
      Advisor
      Githens-Mazer, Jonathan
      Degree title
      PhD in Ethno-Political Studies
      Qualification level
      Doctoral
      Qualification name
      PhD
      URI
      http://hdl.handle.net/10871/19363
      Collections
      • Doctoral Theses

      Using our site |  Freedom of Information |  Data Protection |  Copyright & disclaimer |  Privacy & Cookies | 

       

       

      Related Links
      What is ORE Library Site Research Site
      Browse
      All of ORECommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsTypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsType
      Statistics
      Most Popular ItemsStatistics by Country

      Using our site |  Freedom of Information |  Data Protection |  Copyright & disclaimer |  Privacy & Cookies |