Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGrand-Clement, Emilie
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, K
dc.contributor.authorSmith, D
dc.contributor.authorAngus, M
dc.contributor.authorLuscombe, David J.
dc.contributor.authorGatis, Naomi
dc.contributor.authorBray, L
dc.contributor.authorBrazier, Richard E.
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-29T10:15:50Z
dc.date.issued2015-07-18
dc.description.abstractGlobally, the historic and recent exploitation of peatlands through management practices such as agricultural reclamation, peat harvesting or forestry, have caused extensive damage to these ecosystems. Their value is now increasingly recognised, and restoration and rehabilitation programmes are underway to improve some of the ecosystem services provided by peatlands: blocking drainage ditches in deep peat has been shown to improve the storage of water, decrease carbon losses in the long-term, and improve biodiversity. However, whilst the restoration process has benefitted from experience and technical advice gained from restoration of deep peatlands, shallow peatlands have received less attention in the literature, despite being extensive in both uplands and lowlands. Using the experience gained from the restoration of the shallow peatlands of Exmoor National Park (UK), and two test catchments in particular, this paper provides technical guidance which can be applied to the restoration of other shallow peatlands worldwide. Experience showed that integrating knowledge of the historical environment at the planning stage of restoration was essential, as it enabled the effective mitigation of any threat to archaeological features and sites. The use of bales, commonly employed in other upland ecosystems, was found to be problematic. Instead, ‘leaky dams’ or wood and peat combination dams were used, which are both more efficient at reducing and diverting the flow, and longer lasting than bale dams. Finally, an average restoration cost (£306 ha-1) for Exmoor, below the median national value across the whole of the UK, demonstrates the cost-effectiveness of these techniques. However, local differences in peat depth and ditch characteristics (i.e. length, depth and width) between sites affect both the feasibility and the cost of restoration. Overall, the restoration of shallow peatlands is shown to be technically viable; this paper provides a template for such process over analogous landscapes.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSouth West Wateren_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipTechnology Strategy Boarden_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNERCen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipKnowledge Transfer Partnership programmeen_GB
dc.identifier.citation15 September 2015, Vol. 161, pp. 417–430en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.023
dc.identifier.grantnumberSK04823en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberKTP ID 8099en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/19420
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479715301146en_GB
dc.rightsCopyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectDrainageen_GB
dc.subjectEcosystem servicesen_GB
dc.subjectPeatland restorationen_GB
dc.subjectTechniqueen_GB
dc.subjectDitch blockingen_GB
dc.subjectMiresen_GB
dc.titleNew approaches to the restoration of shallow marginal peatlandsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-01-29T10:15:50Z
dc.identifier.issn0301-4797
dc.descriptionArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1095-8630
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Environmental Managementen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record