Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorToye, Richard
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-10T15:39:44Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-11
dc.description.abstractThis article offers a more systematic assessment of John Maynard Keynes’s attitude to Liberalism, and his engagement with the Liberal Party, than has previously been attempted. It does so as a means of exploring how the study of ideologies should be approached. To Keynes, ideologies were not simply constellations of fixed principles; in his view, policies were always contingent on circumstances, and thus what was appropriate now would become outdated in the future. The Liberal, therefore, needed a flexible and experimental psychological attitude, in order to devise solutions that were appropriate to changing conditions. Using his 1925 lecture ‘Am I a Liberal?’ as a starting point, it is argued here that Keynes saw Liberalism primarily as a discursive practice in the public sphere, that is to say as a technique for ‘doing politics’. We need not take Keynes’s evaluation of his own Liberal mind-set at face value, but it nonetheless casts light on the nature of Liberalism in this period. In spite of the Liberal party’s electoral decline, the political conditions of the 1920s were particularly well suited to Keynes’s vision. For him, Liberalism depended upon, but would also help to facilitate, what he referred to as ‘the emancipation of the mind.’en_GB
dc.identifier.citationThe English Historical Review, 2015en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ehr/cev215
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/19688
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/09/10/ehr.cev215.abstracten_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher's policyen_GB
dc.rights© Oxford University Press 2015. All rights reserved.en_GB
dc.titleKeynes, Liberalism, and ‘The Emancipation of the Mind’en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0013-8266
dc.descriptionThis is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in English Historical Review following peer review. The version of record is available online at doi: 10.1093/ehr/cev215.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalThe English Historical Reviewen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record