Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Ricarda
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-15T11:47:59Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-13
dc.description.abstractStarting from Kleist’s lifelong reflection on education, the essay explores how Kleist criticizes imitation on the level of pedagogy and draws aesthetic conclusions from this which relate to Wieland and Schiller in a constructive way. He learns from both of them that it is not necessarily the presentation of the morally good in art which has the greatest effect. Wieland inspires him to a comic and Schiller to a sublime representation of mistakes from which the reader, rather than the hero, can learn.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 85 (1), pp. 40- 53en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/09593683.2016.1162581
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/19829
dc.language.isodeen_GB
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_GB
dc.subjectBildungen_GB
dc.subjectNachahmungen_GB
dc.subjectErziehung als Konfliktmodellen_GB
dc.subjectdas Komische, das Erhabene, das Paradoxeen_GB
dc.titleMacht und Ohnmacht der Erziehung: Kleist im Kontext von Wieland und Schilleren_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1749-6284
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Routledge via the DOI in this record
dc.identifier.journalPublications of the English Goethe Societyen_GB
refterms.dateFOA2018-01-01T00:00:00Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record