Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThompson, L
dc.contributor.authorMcCabe, Rose
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-15T12:05:34Z
dc.date.issued2012-07-24
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Nonadherence to mental health treatment incurs clinical and economic burdens. The clinician-patient alliance, negotiated through clinical interaction, presents a critical intervention point. Recent medical reviews of communication and adherence behaviour exclude studies with psychiatric samples. The following examines the impact of clinician-patient alliance and communication on adherence in mental health, identifying the specific mechanisms that mobilise patient engagement. METHODS: In December 2010, a systematic search was conducted in Pubmed, PsychInfo, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase and Cinahl and yielded 6672 titles. A secondary hand search was performed in relevant journals, grey literature and reference. RESULTS: 23 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. The methodological quality overall was moderate. 17 studies reported positive associations with adherence, only four of which employed intervention designs. 10 studies examined the association between clinician-patient alliance and adherence. Subjective ratings of clinical communication styles and messages were assessed in 12 studies. 1 study examined the association between objectively rated communication and adherence. Meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity of methods. Findings were presented as a narrative synthesis. CONCLUSIONS: Clinician-patient alliance and communication are associated with more favourable patient adherence. Further research of observer rated communication would better facilitate the application of findings in clinical practice. Establishing agreement on the tasks of treatment, utilising collaborative styles of communication and discussion of treatment specifics may be important for clinicians in promoting cooperation with regimens. These findings align with those in health communication. However, the benefits of shared decision making for adherence in mental health are less conclusive than in general medicine.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMedical Research Councilen_GB
dc.identifier.citationBMC Psychiatry, 2012, Vol. 12: 87en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-244X-12-87
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/19833
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22828119en_GB
dc.rights© Thompson and McCabe; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectCommunicationen_GB
dc.subjectDelivery of Health Careen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectMental Disordersen_GB
dc.subjectPatient Complianceen_GB
dc.subjectPhysician-Patient Relationsen_GB
dc.titleThe effect of clinician-patient alliance and communication on treatment adherence in mental health care: a systematic review.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-02-15T12:05:34Z
dc.identifier.issn1471-244X
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionPublished onlineen_GB
dc.descriptionResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'ten_GB
dc.descriptionReviewen_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMC Psychiatryen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record