Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCussans, J
dc.contributor.authorGoulson, D
dc.contributor.authorSanderson, R
dc.contributor.authorGoffe, L
dc.contributor.authorDarvill, B
dc.contributor.authorOsborne, JL
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-01T14:19:13Z
dc.date.issued2010-07-23
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Insect pollinator abundance, in particular that of bees, has been shown to be high where there is a super-abundance of floral resources; for example in association with mass-flowering crops and also in gardens where flowering plants are often densely planted. Since land management affects pollinator numbers, it is also likely to affect the resultant pollination of plants growing in these habitats. We hypothesised that the seed or fruit set of two plant species, typically pollinated by bumblebees and/or honeybees might respond in one of two ways: 1) pollination success could be reduced when growing in a floriferous environment, via competition for pollinators, or 2) pollination success could be enhanced because of increased pollinator abundance in the vicinity. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We compared the pollination success of experimental plants of Glechoma hederacea L. and Lotus corniculatus L. growing in gardens and arable farmland. On the farms, the plants were placed either next to a mass-flowering crop (oilseed rape, Brassica napus L. or field beans, Vicia faba L.) or next to a cereal crop (wheat, Triticum spp.). Seed set of G. hederacea and fruit set of L. corniculatus were significantly higher in gardens compared to arable farmland. There was no significant difference in pollination success of G. hederacea when grown next to different crops, but for L. corniculatus, fruit set was higher in the plants growing next to oilseed rape when the crop was in flower. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The results show that pollination services can limit fruit set of wild plants in arable farmland, but there is some evidence that the presence of a flowering crop can facilitate their pollination (depending on species and season). We have also demonstrated that gardens are not only beneficial to pollinators, but also to the process of pollination.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded as part of Project BB/E001491, funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of the UK (URL: http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 5, Iss. 7, pp. e11753 -en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0011753
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/20332
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20668704en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0011753en_GB
dc.rightsThis is the final version of the article. It first appeared from Public Library of Science via http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011753.en_GB
dc.subjectAnimalsen_GB
dc.subjectBeesen_GB
dc.subjectEcosystemen_GB
dc.subjectLamiaceaeen_GB
dc.subjectLotusen_GB
dc.subjectPollinationen_GB
dc.subjectSeedsen_GB
dc.titleTwo bee-pollinated plant species show higher seed production when grown in gardens compared to arable farmland.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-03-01T14:19:13Z
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited States
dc.descriptionPublished onlineen_GB
dc.descriptionJournal Articleen_GB
dc.descriptionResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'ten_GB
dc.identifier.journalPLoS Oneen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record