Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLihoreau, M
dc.contributor.authorRaine, NE
dc.contributor.authorReynolds, AM
dc.contributor.authorStelzer, RJ
dc.contributor.authorLim, KS
dc.contributor.authorSmith, AD
dc.contributor.authorOsborne, JL
dc.contributor.authorChittka, L
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-01T14:24:32Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-20
dc.description.abstractCentral place foragers, such as pollinating bees, typically develop circuits (traplines) to visit multiple foraging sites in a manner that minimizes overall travel distance. Despite being taxonomically widespread, these routing behaviours remain poorly understood due to the difficulty of tracking the foraging history of animals in the wild. Here we examine how bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) develop and optimise traplines over large spatial scales by setting up an array of five artificial flowers arranged in a regular pentagon (50 m side length) and fitted with motion-sensitive video cameras to determine the sequence of visitation. Stable traplines that linked together all the flowers in an optimal sequence were typically established after a bee made 26 foraging bouts, during which time only about 20 of the 120 possible routes were tried. Radar tracking of selected flights revealed a dramatic decrease by 80% (ca. 1500 m) of the total travel distance between the first and the last foraging bout. When a flower was removed and replaced by a more distant one, bees engaged in localised search flights, a strategy that can facilitate the discovery of a new flower and its integration into a novel optimal trapline. Based on these observations, we developed and tested an iterative improvement heuristic to capture how bees could learn and refine their routes each time a shorter route is found. Our findings suggest that complex dynamic routing problems can be solved by small-brained animals using simple learning heuristics, without the need for a cognitive map.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by a combined grant from the Wellcome Trust, the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (BB/F52765X/1). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 10, Iss. 9, pp. e1001392 -en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pbio.1001392
dc.identifier.otherPBIOLOGY-D-12-02144
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/20335
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23049479en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/article?id=10.1371/journal.pbio.1001392en_GB
dc.rightsThis is the final version of the article. It first appeared from Public Library of Science via http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001392.en_GB
dc.subjectAnimalsen_GB
dc.subjectBeesen_GB
dc.subjectFlight, Animalen_GB
dc.subjectFlowersen_GB
dc.subjectMotionen_GB
dc.subjectPhotographyen_GB
dc.subjectPollinationen_GB
dc.subjectRadaren_GB
dc.subjectVideo Recordingen_GB
dc.titleRadar tracking and motion-sensitive cameras on flowers reveal the development of pollinator multi-destination routes over large spatial scales.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-03-01T14:24:32Z
dc.identifier.issn1544-9173
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited States
dc.descriptionPublisheden_GB
dc.descriptionJournal Articleen_GB
dc.descriptionResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'ten_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1545-7885
dc.identifier.journalPLoS Biologyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record