Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPaul, SC
dc.contributor.authorPell, JK
dc.contributor.authorBlount, JD
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-03T11:24:13Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractReproductive environments are variable and the resources available for reproduction are finite. If reliable cues about the environment exist, mothers can alter offspring phenotype in a way that increases both offspring and maternal fitness ('anticipatory maternal effects'-AMEs). Strategic use of AMEs is likely to be important in chemically defended species, where the risk of offspring predation may be modulated by maternal investment in offspring toxin level, albeit at some cost to mothers. Whether mothers adjust offspring toxin levels in response to variation in predation risk is, however, unknown, but is likely to be important when assessing the response of chemically defended species to the recent and pervasive changes in the global predator landscape, driven by the spread of invasive species. Using the chemically defended two-spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata, we investigated reproductive investment, including egg toxin level, under conditions that varied in the degree of simulated offspring predation risk from larval harlequin ladybirds, Harmonia axyridis. H. axyridis is a highly voracious alien invasive species in the UK and a significant intraguild predator of A. bipunctata. Females laid fewer, larger egg clusters, under conditions of simulated predation risk (P+) than when predator cues were absent (P-), but there was no difference in toxin level between the two treatments. Among P- females, when mean cluster size increased there were concomitant increases in both the mass and toxin concentration of eggs, however when P+ females increased cluster size there was no corresponding increase in egg toxin level. We conclude that, in the face of offspring predation risk, females either withheld toxins or were physiologically constrained, leading to a trade-off between cluster size and egg toxin level. Our results provide the first demonstration that the risk of offspring predation by a novel invasive predator can influence maternal investment in toxins within their offspring.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipS.C. Paul was funded by a Natural Environment Research Council PhD studentship. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. JK Pell Consulting is the trading name of author J.K. Pell, who is a self employed science consultant (sole trader) in UK; this author contributed to study design and interpretation, decision to publish and preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of the authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 10, e0139404en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0139404
dc.identifier.otherPONE-D-15-28844
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/20404
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS)en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26488753en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/18252en_GB
dc.titleReproduction in risky environments: the role of invasive egg predators in ladybird laying strategies (article)en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-03-03T11:24:13Z
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited States
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from PLOS via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.descriptionWe have made the data for this publication freely available from the University of Exeter Repository: URL http://hdl.handle.net/10871/18252.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPLoS Oneen_GB
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC4619405
dc.identifier.pmid26488753


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record