Porphyry copper enrichment linked to excess aluminium in plagioclase
Nature Publishing Group
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Nature Publishing Group via the DOI in this record.
Reason for embargo
Porphyry copper deposits provide around 75%, 50% and 20% of world copper, molybdenum and gold, respectively1. The deposits are mainly centred on calc-alkaline porphyry magmatic systems2, 3 in subduction zone settings1. Although calc-alkaline magmas are relatively common, large porphyry copper deposits are extremely rare and increasingly difficult to discover. Here, we compile existing geochemical data for magmatic plagioclase, a dominant mineral in calc-alkaline rocks, from fertile (porphyry-associated) and barren magmatic systems worldwide, barren examples having no associated porphyry deposit. We show that plagioclase from fertile systems is distinct in containing ‘excess’ aluminium. This signature is clearly demonstrated in a case study carried out on plagioclase from the fertile La Paloma and Los Sulfatos copper porphyry systems in Chile. Further, the presence of concentric zones of high excess aluminium suggests its incorporation as a result of magmatic processes. As excess aluminium has been linked to high melt water contents, the concentric zones may record injections of hydrous fluid or fluid-rich melts into the sub-porphyry magma chamber. We propose that excess aluminium may exclude copper from plagioclase, so enriching the remaining melts. Furthermore, this chemical signature can be used as an exploration indicator for copper porphyry deposits.
The project would not have been possible without the financial and logistical support of Anglo American, including former and current staff: J. Coppard, V. Irarrazaval, M. Buchanan, E. Liebmann, R. Mattos Pino, E. Centino, J. Andronico, R. Mauricio, D. Fernando and J. Zamorano. J. Spratt (Natural History Museum, London) and S. Pendray (University of Exeter) are thanked for EPMA support and thin section preparation, respectively. K. Cashman (Bristol University), S. Hesselbo, J. Pickles and S. Broom-Fendley (University of Exeter), and reviewer J. Richards (University of Alberta), are gratefully acknowledged for comments on the manuscript.
Vol. 9, (2016), pp. 237–241