Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCreaco, Enrico
dc.contributor.authorFarmani, Raziyeh
dc.contributor.authorVamvakeridou-Lyroudia, Lydia S.
dc.contributor.authorBuchberger, Steven G.
dc.contributor.authorKapelan, Zoran
dc.contributor.authorSavić, Dragan
dc.date.accessioned2016-04-26T15:24:32Z
dc.date.issued2015-01-01
dc.description.abstract© 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This paper presents a comparison of two different modelling approaches for the generation of residential water demand pulses as Poisson processes. Both approaches are able to preserve the mean value of daily water demand. The main difference lies in the fact that the first considers the correlation between pulse durations and intensities whereas the second neglects it. Overall, the results of the applications aimed at reproducing the measured pulses in two households show that the increase in parameterization burden associated with taking correlation into account delivers a considerable improvement in the quality of model predictions.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 119, Issue 1, pp. 1455 - 1462en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.1006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/21255
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights© 2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND licenseen_GB
dc.titleCorrelation or not correlation? This is the question in modeling residential water demand pulsesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-04-26T15:24:32Z
dc.identifier.issn1877-7058
dc.descriptionPublisheden_GB
dc.identifier.journalProcedia Engineeringen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record