Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWhear, R
dc.contributor.authorAbdul-Rahman, AK
dc.contributor.authorThompson-Coon, J
dc.contributor.authorBoddy, K
dc.contributor.authorPerry, MG
dc.contributor.authorStein, K
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-03T15:01:03Z
dc.date.issued2013-12-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The cost to the NHS of missed or inappropriate hospital appointments is considerable. Alternative methods of appointment scheduling might be more flexible to patients' needs without jeopardising health and service quality. The objective was to systematically review evidence of patient initiated clinics in secondary care on patient reported outcomes among patients with chronic/recurrent conditions. METHODS: Seven databases were searched from inception to June 2013. Hand searching of included studies references was also conducted. Studies comparing the effects of patient initiated clinics with traditional consultant led clinics in secondary care for patients with long term chronic or recurrent diseases on health related quality of life and/or patient satisfaction were included. Data was extracted by one reviewer and checked by a second. Results were synthesised narratively. RESULTS: Seven studies were included in the review, these covered a total of 1,655 participants across three conditions: breast cancer, inflammatory bowel disease and rheumatoid arthritis. Quality of reporting was variable. Results showed no significant differences between the intervention and control groups for psychological and health related quality of life outcomes indicating no evidence of harm. Some patients reported significantly more satisfaction using patient-initiated clinics than usual care (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results show potential for patient initiated clinics to result in greater patient and clinician satisfaction. The patient-consultant relationship appeared to play an important part in patient satisfaction and should be considered an important area of future research as should the presence or absence of a guidebook to aid self-management. Patient initiated clinics fit the models of care suggested by policy makers and so further research into long term outcomes for patients and service use in this area of practice is both relevant and timely.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis systematic review was funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) for the South West. The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 13, article 501en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1472-6963-13-501
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/21361
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24289832en_GB
dc.rights© Whear et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013. This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_GB
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnelen_GB
dc.subjectChronic Diseaseen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectPatient Outcome Assessmenten_GB
dc.subjectPatient Satisfactionen_GB
dc.subjectSecondary Care Centersen_GB
dc.titlePatient initiated clinics for patients with chronic or recurrent conditions managed in secondary care: a systematic review of patient reported outcomes and patient and clinician satisfactionen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-05-03T15:01:03Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from BioMed Central via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMC Health Services Researchen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record