Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPrice, SJ
dc.contributor.authorShephard, EA
dc.contributor.authorStapley, SA
dc.contributor.authorBarraclough, K
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, W
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-20T08:33:33Z
dc.date.issued2014-09
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Diagnosis of bladder cancer relies on investigation of symptoms presented to primary care, notably visible haematuria. The importance of non-visible haematuria has never been estimated. AIM: To estimate the risk of bladder cancer with non-visible haematuria. DESIGN AND SETTING: A case-control study using UK electronic primary care medical records, including uncoded data to supplement coded records. METHOD: A total of 4915 patients (aged ≥40 years) diagnosed with bladder cancer between January 2000 and December 2009 were selected from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and matched to 21 718 controls for age, sex, and practice. Variables for visible and non-visible haematuria were derived from coded and uncoded data. Analyses used multivariable conditional logistic regression, followed by estimation of positive predictive values (PPVs) for bladder cancer using Bayes' theorem. RESULTS: Non-visible haematuria (coded/uncoded data) was independently associated with bladder cancer: odds ratio (OR) 20 (95% confidence interval [CI] =12 to 33). The PPV of non-visible haematuria was 1.6% (95% CI = 1.2 to 2.1) in those aged ≥60 years and 0.8% (95% CI = 0.1 to 5.6) in 40-59-year-olds. The PPV of visible haematuria was 2.8% (95% CI = 2.5 to 3.1) and 1.2% (95% CI = 0.6 to 2.3) for the same age groups respectively, lower than those calculated using coded data alone. The proportion of records of visible haematuria in coded, rather than uncoded, format was higher in cases than in controls (P<0.002, χ(2) test). There was no evidence for such differential recording of non-visible haematuria by case/control status (P = 0.78), although, overall, the uncoded format was preferred (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Both non-visible and visible haematuria are associated with bladder cancer, although the visible form confers nearly twice the risk of cancer compared with the non-visible form. GPs' style of record keeping varies by symptom and possible diagnosis.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSarah J Price is funded by a University of Exeter PhD studentship but there was no specific funding for this study.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 64, pp. e584 - e589en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3399/bjgp14X681409
dc.identifier.other64/626/e584
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/21626
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoyal College of General Practitionersen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25179073en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4141616/en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder indefinite embargo in this repository due to publisher policy. The full text is available via the NCBI link in this recorden_GB
dc.subjectbladder canceren_GB
dc.subjectdiagnosisen_GB
dc.subjecthaematuriaen_GB
dc.subjectprimary careen_GB
dc.subjectAbdominal Painen_GB
dc.subjectAgeden_GB
dc.subjectCase-Control Studiesen_GB
dc.subjectDysuriaen_GB
dc.subjectElectronic Health Recordsen_GB
dc.subjectGreat Britainen_GB
dc.subjectHematuriaen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_GB
dc.subjectOdds Ratioen_GB
dc.subjectPrimary Health Careen_GB
dc.subjectRisk Assessmenten_GB
dc.subjectUrinary Bladder Neoplasmsen_GB
dc.titleNon-visible versus visible haematuria and bladder cancer risk: a study of electronic records in primary careen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionAccess to the final published version is available via the NCBI link in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBritish Journal of General Practiceen_GB
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC4141616
dc.identifier.pmid25179073


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record