Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMeng, FM
dc.contributor.authorFu, G
dc.contributor.authorButler, DB
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-24T15:45:32Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractEnd-of-pipe permitting is a widely practised approach to control effluent discharges from wastewater treatment plants. However, the effectiveness of the traditional regulation paradigm is being challenged by increasingly complex environmental issues, ever growing public expectations on water quality and pressures to reduce operational costs and greenhouse gas emissions. To minimise overall environmental impacts from urban wastewater treatment, an operational strategy-based permitting approach is proposed and a four-step decision framework is established: 1) define performance indicators to represent stakeholders’ interests, 2) optimise operational strategies of urban wastewater systems in accordance to the indicators, 3) screen high performance solutions, and 4) derive permits of operational strategies of the wastewater treatment plant. Results from a case study show that operational cost, variability of wastewater treatment efficiency and environmental risk can be simultaneously reduced by at least 7%, 70% and 78% respectively using an optimal integrated operational strategy compared to the baseline scenario. However, trade-offs exist between the objectives thus highlighting the need of expansion of the prevailing wastewater management paradigm beyond the narrow focus on effluent water quality of wastewater treatment plants. Rather, systems thinking should be embraced by integrated control of all forms of urban wastewater discharges and coordinated regulation of environmental risk and treatment cost effectiveness. It is also demonstrated through the case study that permitting operational strategies could yield more environmentally protective solutions without entailing more cost than the conventional end-of-pipe permitting approach. The proposed four-step permitting framework builds on the latest computational techniques (e.g. integrated modelling, multi-objective optimisation, visual analytics) to efficiently optimise and interactively identify high performance solutions. It could facilitate transparent decision making on water quality management as stakeholders are involved in the entire process and their interests are explicitly evaluated using quantitative metrics and trade-offs considered in the decision making process. We conclude that the operational strategy-based permitting shows promising for regulators and water service providers alike.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to thank the financial support from the SANITAS project (EU FP7 Marie Curie Initial Training Network – ITN – 289193) and the support of North Wyke Farm and Atkins.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 101, pp. 114–126en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.watres.2016.05.078
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/21671
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherIWA Publishingen_GB
dc.rightsOpen Access funded by the European Research Council Under a Creative Commons license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleWater quality permitting: from end-of-pipe to operational strategiesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1879-2448
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from IWA Publishing via the DOI in this record.
dc.identifier.journalWater Researchen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record