Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCollen, B
dc.contributor.authorDulvy, NK
dc.contributor.authorGaston, KJ
dc.contributor.authorGärdenfors, U
dc.contributor.authorKeith, DA
dc.contributor.authorPunt, AE
dc.contributor.authorRegan, HM
dc.contributor.authorBöhm, M
dc.contributor.authorHedges, S
dc.contributor.authorSeddon, M
dc.contributor.authorButchart, SH
dc.contributor.authorHilton-Taylor, C
dc.contributor.authorHoffmann, M
dc.contributor.authorBachman, SP
dc.contributor.authorAkçakaya, HR
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-21T07:38:54Z
dc.date.issued2016-04-12
dc.description.abstractThe identification of species at risk of extinction is a central goal of conservation. As the use of data compiled for IUCN Red List assessments expands, a number of misconceptions regarding the purpose, application and use of the IUCN Red List categories and criteria have arisen. We outline five such classes of misconception; the most consequential drive proposals for adapted versions of the criteria, rendering assessments among species incomparable. A key challenge for the future will be to recognize the point where understanding has developed so markedly that it is time for the next generation of the Red List criteria. We do not believe we are there yet but, recognizing the need for scrutiny and continued development of Red Listing, conclude by suggesting areas where additional research could be valuable in improving the understanding of extinction risk among species.en_GB
dc.identifier.citation, Vol. 12en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1098/rsbl.2015.0843
dc.identifier.otherrsbl.2015.0843
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/22186
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoyal Societyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27072401en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher Policyen_GB
dc.subjectclimate changeen_GB
dc.subjectgeographical rangeen_GB
dc.subjectpopulation declineen_GB
dc.subjectrarityen_GB
dc.subjectspatial autocorrelationen_GB
dc.subjectuncertaintyen_GB
dc.titleClarifying misconceptions of extinction risk assessment with the IUCN Red Listen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
exeter.place-of-publicationEngland
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBiology Lettersen_GB
dc.identifier.pmid27072401


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record