Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWalker, DJ
dc.contributor.authorKeedwell, EK
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-29T14:29:27Z
dc.date.issued2016-08-31
dc.description.abstractThe use of hyper-heuristics is increasing in the multi-objective optimisation domain, and the next logical advance in such methods is to use them in the solution of many-objective problems. Such problems comprise four or more objectives and are known to present a significant challenge to standard dominance-based evolutionary algorithms. We in- corporate three comparison operators as alternatives to dominance and investigate their potential to optimise many-objective problems with a hyper-heuristic from the literature. We discover that the best results are obtained using either the favour relation or hypervolume, but conclude that changing the comparison operator alone will not allow for the generation of estimated Pareto fronts that are both close to and fully cover the true Pareto front.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was funded under EPSRC grant EP/K000519/1.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 9921, pp. 493-502
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-319-45823-6_46
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/22312
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag (Germany)en_GB
dc.titleTowards many-objective optimisation with hyper-heuristics: Identifying good heuristics with indicatorsen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1611-3349
dc.identifier.issn0302-9743
dc.descriptionPPSN 2016: 14th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, 17-21 September 2016, Edinburgh, Scotlanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Springer Verlag via the DOI in this record.
dc.identifier.journalLecture Notes in Computer Scienceen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record