Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTørring, ML
dc.contributor.authorFrydenberg, M
dc.contributor.authorHansen, RP
dc.contributor.authorOlesen, F
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, W
dc.contributor.authorVedsted, P
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-30T13:30:27Z
dc.date.issued2011-03-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The relationship between the diagnostic interval and mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC) is unclear. This association was examined by taking account of important confounding factors at the time of first presentation of symptoms in primary care. METHODS: A total of 268 patients with CRC were included in a prospective, population-based study in a Danish county. The diagnostic interval was defined as the time from first presentation of symptoms until diagnosis. We analysed patients separately according to the general practitioner's interpretation of symptoms. Logistic regression was used to estimate 3-year mortality odds ratios as a function of the diagnostic interval using restricted cubic splines and adjusting for tumour site, comorbidity, age, and sex. RESULTS: In patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of cancer or any other serious illness, the risk of dying within 3 years decreased with diagnostic intervals up to 5 weeks and then increased (P=0.002). In patients presenting with vague symptoms, the association was reverse, although not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Detecting cancer in primary care is two sided: aimed at expediting ill patients while preventing healthy people from going to hospital. This likely explains the counterintuitive findings; but it does not explain the increasing mortality with longer diagnostic intervals. Thus, this study provides evidence for the hypothesis that the length of the diagnostic interval affects mortality in CRC patients.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was supported by grants from the Danish Cancer Society, the Novo Nordic Foundation, the Danish Graduate School in Public Health Science, and Aarhus University.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 104, pp. 934 - 940en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/bjc.2011.60
dc.identifier.otherbjc201160
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/22333
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCancer Research UKen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21364593en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v104/n6/full/bjc201160a.htmlen_GB
dc.rightsThis is the final version of the article. Available from Cancer Research UK via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.subjectAdolescenten_GB
dc.subjectAdulten_GB
dc.subjectAge of Onseten_GB
dc.subjectAgeden_GB
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen_GB
dc.subjectAlgorithmsen_GB
dc.subjectCarcinomaen_GB
dc.subjectCohort Studiesen_GB
dc.subjectColorectal Neoplasmsen_GB
dc.subjectFemaleen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectMaleen_GB
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_GB
dc.subjectPrimary Health Careen_GB
dc.subjectRegistriesen_GB
dc.subjectSurvival Analysisen_GB
dc.subjectTime Factorsen_GB
dc.subjectYoung Adulten_GB
dc.titleTime to diagnosis and mortality in colorectal cancer: a cohort study in primary care.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-06-30T13:30:27Z
dc.identifier.issn0007-0920
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionPublisheden_GB
dc.descriptionJournal Articleen_GB
dc.descriptionResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'ten_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1532-1827
dc.identifier.journalBritish Journal of Canceren_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record