Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDommett, RM
dc.contributor.authorRedaniel, T
dc.contributor.authorStevens, MC
dc.contributor.authorMartin, RM
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, W
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-06T11:58:40Z
dc.date.issued2012-12-31
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Guidelines describing symptoms in children that should alert GPs to consider cancer have been developed, but without any supporting primary-care research. AIM: To identify symptoms and signs in primary care that strongly increase the likelihood of childhood cancer, to assist GPs in selection of children for investigation. DESIGN AND SETTING: A population-based case-control study in UK general practice. METHOD: Using electronic primary care records from the UK General Practice Research Database, 1267 children aged 0-14 years diagnosed with childhood cancer were matched to 15 318 controls. Clinical features associated with subsequent diagnosis of cancer were identified using conditional logistic regression, and likelihood ratios and positive predictive values (PPVs) were estimated for each. RESULTS: Twelve symptoms were associated with PPVs of ≥0.04%, which represents a greater than tenfold increase in prior probability. The six symptoms with the highest PPVs were pallor (odds ratio, OR = 84; PPV = 0.41% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.12% to 1.34%), head and neck masses (OR = 17; PPV = 0.30%; 95% CI = 0.10% to 0.84%), masses elsewhere (OR = 22; PPV = 0.11%; 95% CI = 0.06% to 0.20%), lymphadenopathy (OR = 10; PPV = 0.09%; 95% CI = 0.06% to 0.13%), symptoms/signs of abnormal movement (OR = 16; PPV = 0.08%; 95% CI = 0.04% to 0.14%), and bruising (OR = 12; PPV = 0·08%; 95% CI = 0.05% to 0.13%). When each of these 12 symptoms was combined singly with at least three consultations in a 3-month period, the probability of cancer was between 11 and 76 in 10 000. CONCLUSION: Twelve features of childhood cancers were identified, each of which increased the risk of cancer at least tenfold. These symptoms, particularly when combined with multiple consultations, warrant careful evaluation in general practice.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR), UK.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 63, pp. e22-e29en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3399/bjgp13X660742
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/22414
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoyal College of General Practitionersen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://bjgp.org/content/63/606/e22en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder indefinite embargo due to publisher policy. The final version is available from Royal College of General Practitioners via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.subjectAdolescenten_GB
dc.subjectAge of Onseten_GB
dc.subjectCase-Control Studiesen_GB
dc.subjectChilden_GB
dc.subjectChild, Preschoolen_GB
dc.subjectEarly Detection of Canceren_GB
dc.subjectFemaleen_GB
dc.subjectGeneral Practiceen_GB
dc.subjectGreat Britainen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectInfanten_GB
dc.subjectInfant, Newbornen_GB
dc.subjectMaleen_GB
dc.subjectMedical Records Systems, Computerizeden_GB
dc.subjectNeoplasmsen_GB
dc.subjectOdds Ratioen_GB
dc.subjectPopulation Surveillanceen_GB
dc.subjectPractice Guidelines as Topicen_GB
dc.subjectPredictive Value of Testsen_GB
dc.subjectPrimary Health Careen_GB
dc.titleRisk of childhood cancer with symptoms in primary care: a population-based case-control study.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0960-1643
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1478-5242
dc.identifier.journalBritish Journal of General Practiceen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record