Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorShephard, EA
dc.contributor.authorStapley, S
dc.contributor.authorNeal, RD
dc.contributor.authorRose, P
dc.contributor.authorWalter, FM
dc.contributor.authorHamilton, W
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-06T12:56:48Z
dc.date.issued2012-09
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Bladder cancer accounts for over 150,000 deaths worldwide. No screening is available, so diagnosis depends on investigations of symptoms. Of these, only visible haematuria has been studied in primary care. AIM: To identify and quantify the features of bladder cancer in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Case-control study, using electronic medical records from UK primary care. METHOD: Participants were 4915 patients aged ≥40 years, diagnosed with bladder cancer January 2000 to December 2009, and 21,718 age, sex, and practice-matched controls, were selected from the General Practice Research Database, UK. All clinical features independently associated with bladder cancer using conditional logistic regression were identified, and their positive predictive values for bladder cancer, singly and in combination, were estimated. RESULTS: Cases consulted their GP more frequently than controls before diagnosis: median 15 consultations (interquartile range 9-22) versus 8 (4-15): P<0.001. Seven features were independently associated with bladder cancer: visible haematuria, odds ratio 34 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 29 to 41), dysuria 4.1 (95% CI = 3.4 to 5.0), urinary tract infection 2.2 (95% CI = 2.0 to 2.5), raised white blood cell count 2.1 (95% CI = 1.6 to 2.8), abdominal pain 2.0 (95% CI = 1.6 to 2.4), constipation 1.5 (95% CI = 1.2 to 1.9), raised inflammatory markers 1.5 (95% CI = 1.2 to 1.9), and raised creatinine 1.3 (95% CI = 1.2 to 1.4). The positive predictive value for visible haematuria in patients aged ≥60 years was PPV of 2.6% (95% CI = 2.2 to 3.2). CONCLUSION: Visible haematuria is the commonest and most powerful predictor of bladder cancer in primary care, and warrants investigation. Most other previously reported features of bladder cancer were associated with the disease, but with low predictive values. There is a need for improved diagnostic methods, for those patients whose bladder cancer presents without visible haematuria.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was funded by the NIHR Programme Grants for Applied Research funding scheme, RP-PG-0608-10045. William T Hamilton was part-funded by a NIHR post-doctoral fellowshipen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 62, e598 - e604en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3399/bjgp12X654560
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/22416
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherRoyal College of General Practitionersen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22947580en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder indefinite embargo due to publisher policy. The final version is freely available from publisher via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.subjectAbdominal Painen_GB
dc.subjectAdulten_GB
dc.subjectAgeden_GB
dc.subjectAged, 80 and overen_GB
dc.subjectCase-Control Studiesen_GB
dc.subjectConstipationen_GB
dc.subjectDysuriaen_GB
dc.subjectFemaleen_GB
dc.subjectGeneral Practiceen_GB
dc.subjectGreat Britainen_GB
dc.subjectHematuriaen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectMaleen_GB
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_GB
dc.subjectPatient Acceptance of Health Careen_GB
dc.subjectUrinary Bladder Neoplasmsen_GB
dc.titleClinical features of bladder cancer in primary careen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1470-0328
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.identifier.journalBritish Journal of General Practiceen_GB
dc.identifier.pmid22947580


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record