Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGalton, AP
dc.contributor.authorWood, ZM
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-29T14:15:02Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-06
dc.description.abstractExpressions designating collectives, such as “the committee” or “the ships in the port”, may be interpreted de re or de dicto, depending on context, according as they pick out collectives defined by their members or collectives defined by some criterion for membership. We call these E(xtensional)-collectives and I(ntensional)-collectives respectively, and in this paper we explore in depth the relationship between these two categories. In particular, we identify important respects in which they differ, regarding the nature of the dependence of the collective on its members, the nature of the parthood relation in which the members stand to the whole, and, from an application perspective, the different methods used for identifying the two forms of collective from large spatio-temporal data-sets.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 11 (3), pp. 205-226
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/AO-160168
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/22792
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherIOS Pressen_GB
dc.rightsThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from IOS Press via the DOI in this record.
dc.titleExtensional and intensional collectives and the de re/de dicto distinctionen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1570-5838
dc.identifier.eissn1875-8533
dc.identifier.journalApplied Ontologyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record