Sitting behavior and obesity: evidence from the Whitehall II study.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier Masson via the DOI in this record.
BACKGROUND: Prospective studies report associations between indicators of time spent sitting and obesity risk. Most studies use a single indicator of sedentary behavior and are unable to clearly identify whether sedentary behavior is a cause or a consequence of obesity. PURPOSE: To investigate cross-sectional and prospective associations between multiple sitting time indicators and obesity and examine the possibility of reverse causality. METHODS: Using data from the Whitehall II cohort, multiple logistic models were fitted to examine associations between prevalent obesity (BMI ≥30) at Phase 5 (1997-1999), and incident obesity between Phases 5 and 7 (2003-2004) across four levels of five sitting exposures (work sitting, TV viewing, non-TV leisure-time sitting, leisure-time sitting, and total sitting). Using obesity data from three prior phases (1985-1988, 1991-1993; and recalled weight at age 25 years), linear regression models were fitted to examine the association between prior obesity and sitting time at Phase 5. Analyses were conducted in 2012. RESULTS: None of the sitting exposures were associated with obesity either cross-sectionally or prospectively. Obesity at one previous measurement phase was associated with a 2.43-hour/week (95% CI=0.07, 4.78) increase in TV viewing; obesity at three previous phases was associated with a 7.42-hour/week (95% CI=2.7, 12.46) increase in TV-viewing hours/week at Phase 5. CONCLUSIONS: Sitting time was not associated with obesity cross-sectionally or prospectively. Prior obesity was prospectively associated with time spent watching TV per week but not other types of sitting.
The Whitehall II study is supported by grants from the Medical Research Council (G0902037); British Heart Foundation (RG/07/008/23674); Stroke Association; National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (5RO1 HL036310); and National Institute on Aging (5RO1AG13196 and 5RO1AG034454). This report is independent research arising partly from a Career Development Fellowship supported by the National Institute for Health Research (to E. Stamatakis). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, or the Department of Health.
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Vol. 44, Iss. 2, pp. 132 - 138
Place of publication