Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPulsford, RM
dc.contributor.authorStamatakis, E
dc.contributor.authorBritton, AR
dc.contributor.authorBrunner, EJ
dc.contributor.authorHillsdon, MM
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-15T14:15:43Z
dc.date.issued2013-02
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Prospective studies report associations between indicators of time spent sitting and obesity risk. Most studies use a single indicator of sedentary behavior and are unable to clearly identify whether sedentary behavior is a cause or a consequence of obesity. PURPOSE: To investigate cross-sectional and prospective associations between multiple sitting time indicators and obesity and examine the possibility of reverse causality. METHODS: Using data from the Whitehall II cohort, multiple logistic models were fitted to examine associations between prevalent obesity (BMI ≥30) at Phase 5 (1997-1999), and incident obesity between Phases 5 and 7 (2003-2004) across four levels of five sitting exposures (work sitting, TV viewing, non-TV leisure-time sitting, leisure-time sitting, and total sitting). Using obesity data from three prior phases (1985-1988, 1991-1993; and recalled weight at age 25 years), linear regression models were fitted to examine the association between prior obesity and sitting time at Phase 5. Analyses were conducted in 2012. RESULTS: None of the sitting exposures were associated with obesity either cross-sectionally or prospectively. Obesity at one previous measurement phase was associated with a 2.43-hour/week (95% CI=0.07, 4.78) increase in TV viewing; obesity at three previous phases was associated with a 7.42-hour/week (95% CI=2.7, 12.46) increase in TV-viewing hours/week at Phase 5. CONCLUSIONS: Sitting time was not associated with obesity cross-sectionally or prospectively. Prior obesity was prospectively associated with time spent watching TV per week but not other types of sitting.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Whitehall II study is supported by grants from the Medical Research Council (G0902037); British Heart Foundation (RG/07/008/23674); Stroke Association; National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (5RO1 HL036310); and National Institute on Aging (5RO1AG13196 and 5RO1AG034454). This report is independent research arising partly from a Career Development Fellowship supported by the National Institute for Health Research (to E. Stamatakis). The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the National Institute for Health Research, or the Department of Health.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 44, Iss. 2, pp. 132 - 138en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.009
dc.identifier.otherS0749-3797(12)00759-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/23480
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevier Massonen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23332328en_GB
dc.rightsThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier Masson via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.subjectAdulten_GB
dc.subjectCross-Sectional Studiesen_GB
dc.subjectFemaleen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectLinear Modelsen_GB
dc.subjectLogistic Modelsen_GB
dc.subjectMaleen_GB
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_GB
dc.subjectObesityen_GB
dc.subjectProspective Studiesen_GB
dc.subjectResearch Designen_GB
dc.subjectRisken_GB
dc.subjectSedentary Lifestyleen_GB
dc.subjectTelevisionen_GB
dc.subjectTime Factorsen_GB
dc.titleSitting behavior and obesity: evidence from the Whitehall II study.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-09-15T14:15:43Z
dc.identifier.issn0749-3797
exeter.place-of-publicationNetherlandsen_GB
dc.descriptionPublisheden_GB
dc.descriptionJournal Articleen_GB
dc.descriptionResearch Support, N.I.H., Extramuralen_GB
dc.descriptionResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'ten_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1873-2607
dc.identifier.journalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicineen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record