Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLiu , Riyao
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-04T11:18:21Z
dc.date.issued2016-05-19
dc.description.abstractIt is well known that in English law the indemnity insurers stand in a better position than the assureds and this is especially true when a claim is delayed: in that scenario, the insurer is neither liable for the damage caused by the late payment, nor for the compound interest. In Sprung v. Royal Insurance ([1999] 1 Lloyd's Rep IR 111) this unfair situation was justified by the Court of Appeal, naturally, it brought an opportunity for the Law Commission to reconsider the law. Recently, the new Insurance Act 2015 has been enacted and subsequently amended by the Enterprise Act 2016 in regards to the insurer’s obligation to make a timely payment; however, the legal effect of the new legislation is unknown due to the lack of binding precedents. In this work, the duty of the indemnity insurer shall be discussed in full and this work will try to make a contribution to the interpretation of the new legislation regarding to the obligation of the insurer and remedies for the assured.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/23750
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.subjectIndemnity Insurance, Damages, Interest, Late Paymenten_GB
dc.titleThe Assured's Remedies for Late Payment in Indemnity Insurance Claimsen_GB
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_GB
dc.date.available2016-10-04T11:18:21Z
dc.contributor.advisorMerkin, Rob
dc.publisher.departmentCollege of Social Sciences and International Studiesen_GB
dc.type.degreetitlePhD in Lawen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnamePhDen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record