Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTurchin, P
dc.contributor.authorCurrie, TE
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-07T10:27:16Z
dc.date.issued2016-01
dc.description.abstractThe evidence compiled in the target article demonstrates that the assumptions of cultural group selection (CGS) theory are often met, and it is therefore a useful framework for generating plausible hypotheses. However, more can be said about how we can test the predictions of CGS hypotheses against competing explanations using historical, archaeological, and anthropological data.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 39, article e55en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0140525X15000278
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/24291
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Press (CUP)en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27561229en_GB
dc.titleCultural group selection is plausible, but the predictions of its hypotheses should be tested with real-world dataen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-11-07T10:27:16Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBehavioral and Brain Sciencesen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record