Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHusk, K
dc.contributor.authorBlockley, K
dc.contributor.authorLovell, R
dc.contributor.authorBethel, A
dc.contributor.authorBloomfield, D
dc.contributor.authorWarber, S
dc.contributor.authorPearson, M
dc.contributor.authorLang, I
dc.contributor.authorByng, R
dc.contributor.authorGarside, R
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-11T10:20:18Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-03
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: The use of non-drug, non-health-service interventions has been proposed as a cost-effective alternative to help those with long-term conditions manage their illness and improve their health and well-being. Interventions typically involve accessing activities run by the third sector or community agencies and may also be described as non-medical referral, community referral or social prescribing. To be effective, patients need to be "transferred" from the primary care setting into the community and to maintain their participation in activities. However, it is not currently known how and why these approaches enable which people under what circumstances to reach community services that may benefit their health and well-being. METHODS: Database searches and extensive searching of grey sources will be carried out in an attempt to find evidence associated with referral and retention in social prescribing. After initial scoping searches, two main phases of searching will be conducted: (a) will focus on the identification of programme theories to illustrate how approaches to social prescribing work for different people and in different contexts and (b) will consist of targeted searches to locate evidence to refine these candidate theories into configurations of the contexts in which populations and the main mechanisms outcomes are achieved. Inclusion criteria will initially be broad in order to develop a clear picture of the ways in which social prescriptions might operate but may iteratively become more focused in response to initially identified evidence, for example, in terms of the population group. An expert advisory group consisting of professionals working in a range of organisations involved in social prescribing will be convened to check the approaches in the review and provide real-life experience of social prescribing. Findings from the review will be disseminated to commissioners, published in a peer-reviewed journal and used to help refine an intervention model for an outdoor nature-based group intervention. DISCUSSION: This realist review will explore why mechanisms of social prescribing work, for what groups of people and their impact on enrolment, attendance and adherence to programmes. The use of realist approaches to detail the social prescribing process is novel and will offer insights into effective transfer of patients.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was partially funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula at the Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 5, article 93en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13643-016-0269-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/24377
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27255362en_GB
dc.rightsOpen Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_GB
dc.subjectCommunity referralen_GB
dc.subjectMental healthen_GB
dc.subjectPrimary careen_GB
dc.subjectRealist reviewen_GB
dc.subjectSocial prescribingen_GB
dc.titleWhat approaches to social prescribing work, for whom, and in what circumstances? A protocol for a realist reviewen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-11-11T10:20:18Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from BioMed Central via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalSystematic Reviewsen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record